mirror of
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git
synced 2025-04-29 19:30:36 +02:00
remove gds docs, telling users instead to use geiser and paredit
* doc/ref/scheme-using.texi (Using Guile in Emacs): Remove GDS docs, as we don't have GDS any more. Instead of surveying the field, be opinionated and tell users what to use: Geiser and Paredit.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ced9917e12
commit
767dbb1af3
1 changed files with 46 additions and 717 deletions
|
@ -567,735 +567,64 @@ Finally, as a word to the wise: hackers close their REPL prompts with
|
|||
@node Using Guile in Emacs
|
||||
@section Using Guile in Emacs
|
||||
|
||||
@cindex GDS
|
||||
@cindex Emacs
|
||||
There are several options for working on Guile Scheme code in Emacs.
|
||||
The simplest are to use Emacs's standard @code{scheme-mode} for
|
||||
editing code, and to run the interpreter when you need it by typing
|
||||
``guile'' at the prompt of a @code{*shell*} buffer, but there are
|
||||
Emacs libraries available which add various bells and whistles to
|
||||
this. The following diagram shows these libraries and how they relate
|
||||
to each other, with the arrows indicating ``builds on'' or
|
||||
``extends''. For example, the Quack library builds on cmuscheme,
|
||||
which in turn builds on the standard scheme mode.
|
||||
Any text editor can edit Scheme, but some are better than others. Emacs
|
||||
is the best, of course, and not just because it is a fine text editor.
|
||||
Emacs has good support for Scheme out of the box, with sensible
|
||||
indentation rules, parenthesis-matching, syntax highlighting, and even a
|
||||
set of keybindings for structural editing, allowing navigation,
|
||||
cut-and-paste, and transposition operations that work on balanced
|
||||
S-expressions.
|
||||
|
||||
@iftex
|
||||
@center @image{scheme,5in}
|
||||
@end iftex
|
||||
@ifnottex
|
||||
@example
|
||||
@verbatiminclude scheme.txt
|
||||
@end example
|
||||
@end ifnottex
|
||||
As good as it is, though, two things will vastly improve your experience
|
||||
with Emacs and Guile.
|
||||
|
||||
@dfn{scheme}, written by Bill Rozas and Dave Love, is Emacs's standard
|
||||
mode for Scheme code files. It provides Scheme-sensitive syntax
|
||||
highlighting, parenthesis matching, indentation and so on.
|
||||
@cindex Paredit
|
||||
The first is Taylor Campbell's
|
||||
@uref{http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ParEdit, Paredit}. You should not
|
||||
code in any dialect of Lisp without Paredit. (They say that
|
||||
unopinionated writing is boring---hence this tone---but it's the
|
||||
truth, regardless.) Paredit is the bee's knees.
|
||||
|
||||
@dfn{cmuscheme}, written by Olin Shivers, provides a comint-based Scheme
|
||||
interaction buffer, so that you can run an interpreter more directly
|
||||
than with the @code{*shell*} buffer approach by typing @kbd{M-x
|
||||
run-scheme}. It also extends @code{scheme-mode} so that there are key
|
||||
presses for sending selected bits of code from a Scheme buffer to this
|
||||
interpreter. This means that when you are writing some code and want to
|
||||
check what an expression evaluates to, you can easily select that code
|
||||
and send it to the interpreter for evaluation, then switch to the
|
||||
interpreter to see what the result is. cmuscheme is included in the
|
||||
standard Emacs distribution.
|
||||
@cindex Geiser
|
||||
The second is José Antonio Ortega Ruiz's
|
||||
@uref{http://www.nongnu.org/geiser/, Geiser}. Geiser complements Emacs'
|
||||
@code{scheme-mode} with tight integration to running Guile processes via
|
||||
a @code{comint-mode} REPL buffer.
|
||||
|
||||
@dfn{Quack}, written by Neil Van Dyke, adds a number of incremental
|
||||
improvements to the scheme/cmuscheme combination: convenient menu
|
||||
entries for looking up Scheme-related references (such as the SRFIs);
|
||||
enhanced indentation rules that are customized for particular Scheme
|
||||
interpreters, including Guile; an enhanced version of the
|
||||
@code{run-scheme} command that knows the names of the common Scheme
|
||||
interpreters and remembers which one you used last time; and so on.
|
||||
Quack is available from @uref{http://www.neilvandyke.org/quack}.
|
||||
Of course there are keybindings to switch to the REPL, and a good REPL
|
||||
environment, but Geiser goes beyond that, providing:
|
||||
|
||||
@dfn{GDS}, written by Neil Jerram, also builds on the scheme/cmuscheme
|
||||
combination, but with a change to the way that Scheme code fragments
|
||||
are sent to the interpreter for evaluation. cmuscheme and Quack send
|
||||
code fragments to the interpreter's standard input, on the assumption
|
||||
that the interpreter is expecting to read Scheme expressions there,
|
||||
and then monitor the interpreter's standard output to infer what the
|
||||
result of the evaluation is. GDS doesn't use standard input and
|
||||
output like this. Instead, it sets up a socket connection between the
|
||||
Scheme interpreter and Emacs, and sends and receives messages using a
|
||||
simple protocol through this socket. The messages include requests to
|
||||
evaluate Scheme code, and responses conveying the results of an
|
||||
evaluation, thus providing similar function to cmuscheme or Quack.
|
||||
They also include requests for stack exploration and debugging, which
|
||||
go beyond what cmuscheme or Quack can do. The price of this extra
|
||||
power, however, is that GDS is Guile-specific. GDS requires the
|
||||
Scheme interpreter to run some GDS-specific library code; currently
|
||||
this code is written as a Guile module and uses features that are
|
||||
specific to Guile. GDS is now included in the Guile distribution; for
|
||||
previous Guile releases (1.8.4 and earlier) it can be obtained as part
|
||||
of the @code{guile-debugging} package from
|
||||
@uref{http://www.ossau.uklinux.net/guile}.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, @dfn{xscheme} is similar to cmuscheme --- in that it starts up
|
||||
a Scheme interaction process and sends commands to that process's
|
||||
standard input --- and to GDS --- in that it has support beyond
|
||||
cmuscheme or Quack for exploring the Scheme stack when an error has
|
||||
occurred --- but is implemented specifically for MIT/GNU Scheme. Hence
|
||||
it isn't really relevant to Guile work in Emacs, except as a reference
|
||||
for useful features that could be implemented in one of the other
|
||||
libraries mentioned here.
|
||||
|
||||
In summary, the best current choice for working on Guile code in Emacs
|
||||
is either Quack or GDS, depending on which of these libraries' features
|
||||
you find most important. For more information on Quack, please see the
|
||||
website referenced above. GDS is documented further in the rest of this
|
||||
section.
|
||||
|
||||
@menu
|
||||
* GDS Introduction::
|
||||
* GDS Architecture::
|
||||
* GDS Getting Started::
|
||||
* Working with GDS in Scheme Buffers::
|
||||
* Displaying the Scheme Stack::
|
||||
* Continuing Execution::
|
||||
* Associating Buffers with Clients::
|
||||
* An Example GDS Session::
|
||||
@end menu
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node GDS Introduction
|
||||
@subsection GDS Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
GDS aims to allow you to work on Guile Scheme code in the same kind of
|
||||
way that Emacs allows you to work on Emacs Lisp code: providing easy
|
||||
access to help, evaluating arbitrary fragments of code, a nice debugging
|
||||
interface, and so on. The thinking behind the GDS library is that you
|
||||
will usually be doing one of two things.
|
||||
|
||||
@enumerate
|
||||
@itemize @bullet
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Writing or editing code. The code will be in a normal Emacs Scheme mode
|
||||
buffer, and GDS extends Scheme mode to add keystrokes and menu items for
|
||||
the things that are likely to be useful to you when working on code:
|
||||
|
||||
@itemize
|
||||
Form evaluation in the context of the current file's module.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
completing the identifier at point, with respect to the set of variable
|
||||
names that are known to the associated Guile process
|
||||
Macro expansion.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
accessing Guile's built in ``help'' and ``apropos'' commands
|
||||
File/module loading and/or compilation.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
evaluating fragments of code to check what they do, with the results
|
||||
popping up in a temporary Emacs window.
|
||||
Namespace-aware identifier completion (including local bindings, names
|
||||
visible in the current module, and module names).
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Autodoc: the echo area shows information about the signature of the
|
||||
procedure/macro around point automatically.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Jump to definition of identifier at point.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Access to documentation (including docstrings when the implementation
|
||||
provides it).
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Listings of identifiers exported by a given module.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Listings of callers/callees of procedures.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Rudimentary support for debugging and error navigation.
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Support for multiple, simultaneous REPLs.
|
||||
@end itemize
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
Debugging a Guile Scheme program. When your program hits an error or
|
||||
stops at a trap, GDS shows you the relevant code and the Scheme stack,
|
||||
and makes it easy to
|
||||
|
||||
@itemize
|
||||
@item
|
||||
look at the values of local variables
|
||||
@item
|
||||
see what is happening at all levels of the Scheme stack
|
||||
@item
|
||||
continue execution, either normally or step by step.
|
||||
@end itemize
|
||||
|
||||
The presentation makes it very easy to move up and down the stack,
|
||||
showing whenever possible the source code for each frame in another
|
||||
Emacs buffer. It also provides convenient keystrokes for telling Guile
|
||||
what to do next; for example, you can select a stack frame and tell
|
||||
Guile to run until that frame completes, at which point GDS will display
|
||||
the frame's return value.
|
||||
@end enumerate
|
||||
|
||||
GDS can provide these facilities for any number of Guile Scheme programs
|
||||
(which we often refer to as ``clients'') at once, and these programs can
|
||||
be started either independently of GDS, including outside Emacs, or
|
||||
specifically @emph{by} GDS.
|
||||
|
||||
Communication between each Guile client program and GDS uses a TCP
|
||||
socket, which means that it is orthogonal to any other interfaces that
|
||||
the client program has. In particular GDS does not interfere with a
|
||||
program's standard input and output.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node GDS Architecture
|
||||
@subsection GDS Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
In order to understand the following documentation fully it will help to
|
||||
have a picture in mind of how GDS works, so we briefly describe that
|
||||
here. GDS consists of three components.
|
||||
|
||||
@itemize
|
||||
@item
|
||||
The GDS @dfn{interface} code is written in Emacs Lisp and runs inside
|
||||
Emacs. This code, consisting of the installed files @file{gds.el} and
|
||||
@file{gds-server.el}, is responsible for displaying information from
|
||||
Guile in Emacs windows, and for responding to Emacs commands and
|
||||
keystrokes by sending instructions back to the Guile program being
|
||||
worked on.
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
The GDS @dfn{server} code is written in Scheme and runs as an Emacs
|
||||
inferior process. It acts as a multiplexer between the (possibly
|
||||
multiple) Guile programs being debugged and the interface code running
|
||||
in Emacs. The server code is the installed file
|
||||
@file{gds-server.scm}.
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
The GDS @dfn{client} code is written in Scheme (installed file
|
||||
@file{gds-client.scm}), and must be loaded as a module by each Guile
|
||||
program that wants to use GDS in any way.
|
||||
@end itemize
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
The following diagram shows how these components are connected to each
|
||||
other.
|
||||
|
||||
@iftex
|
||||
@center @image{gds,5in}
|
||||
@end iftex
|
||||
@ifnottex
|
||||
@example
|
||||
@verbatiminclude gds.txt
|
||||
@end example
|
||||
@end ifnottex
|
||||
|
||||
@cindex TCP, use of
|
||||
The data exchanged between client and server components, and between
|
||||
server and interface, is a sequence of sexps (parenthesised expressions)
|
||||
that are designed so as to be directly readable by both Scheme and Emacs
|
||||
Lisp. The use of a TCP connection means that the server and Emacs
|
||||
interface can theoretically be on a different computer from the client
|
||||
programs, but in practice there are currently two problems with
|
||||
this. Firstly the GDS API doesn't provide any way of specifying a
|
||||
non-local server to connect to, and secondly there is no security or
|
||||
authentication mechanism in the GDS protocol. These are issues that
|
||||
should be addressed in the future.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node GDS Getting Started
|
||||
@subsection Getting Started with GDS
|
||||
|
||||
To enable the use of GDS in your own Emacs sessions, simply add
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(require 'gds)
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
somewhere in your @file{.emacs} file. This will cause Emacs to load the
|
||||
GDS Emacs Lisp code when starting up, and to start the inferior GDS
|
||||
server process so that it is ready and waiting for any Guile programs
|
||||
that want to use GDS.
|
||||
|
||||
(If GDS's Scheme code is not installed in one of the locations in
|
||||
Guile's load path, you may find that the server process fails to start.
|
||||
When this happens you will see an error message from Emacs:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
error in process filter: Wrong type argument: listp, Backtrace:
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
and the @code{gds-debug} buffer will contain a Scheme backtrace ending
|
||||
with the message:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
no code for module (ice-9 gds-server)
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
The solution for this is to customize the Emacs variable
|
||||
@code{gds-scheme-directory} so that it specifies where the GDS Scheme
|
||||
code is installed. Then either restart Emacs or type @kbd{M-x
|
||||
gds-run-debug-server} to try starting the GDS server process again.)
|
||||
|
||||
For evaluations, help and completion from Scheme code buffers that you
|
||||
are working on, this is all you need. The first time you do any of
|
||||
these things, GDS will automatically start a new Guile client program as
|
||||
an Emacs subprocess. This Guile program does nothing but wait for and
|
||||
act on instructions from GDS, and we refer to it as a @dfn{utility}
|
||||
Guile client. Over time this utility client will accumulate the code
|
||||
that you ask it to evaluate, and you can also tell it to load complete
|
||||
files or modules by sending it @code{load} or @code{use-modules}
|
||||
expressions.
|
||||
|
||||
When you want to use GDS to work on an independent Guile
|
||||
application, you need to add something to that application's Scheme code
|
||||
to cause it to connect to and interact with GDS at the right times. The
|
||||
following subsections describe the ways of doing this.
|
||||
|
||||
@subsubsection Invoking GDS when an Exception Occurs
|
||||
|
||||
One option is to use GDS to catch and display any exceptions that
|
||||
are thrown by the application's code. If you already have a
|
||||
@code{lazy-catch} or @code{with-throw-handler} around the area of code
|
||||
that you want to monitor, you just need to add the following to the
|
||||
handler code:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(gds-debug-trap (throw->trap-context key args))
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
where @code{key} and @code{args} are the first and rest arguments that
|
||||
Guile passes to the handler. (In other words, they assume the handler
|
||||
signature @code{(lambda (key . args) @dots{})}.) With Guile 1.8 or
|
||||
later, you can also do this with a @code{catch}, by adding this same
|
||||
code to the catch's pre-unwind handler.
|
||||
|
||||
If you don't already have any of these, insert a whole
|
||||
@code{with-throw-handler} expression (or @code{lazy-catch} if your Guile
|
||||
is pre-1.8) around the code of interest like this:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(with-throw-handler #t
|
||||
(lambda ()
|
||||
;; Protected code here.
|
||||
)
|
||||
(lambda (key . args)
|
||||
(gds-debug-trap (throw->trap-context key args))))
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
Either way, you will need to use the @code{(ice-9 gds-client)} and
|
||||
@code{(ice-9 debugging traps)} modules.
|
||||
|
||||
Two special cases of this are the lazy-catch that the Guile REPL code
|
||||
uses to catch exceptions in user code, and the lazy-catch inside the
|
||||
@code{stack-catch} utility procedure that is provided by the
|
||||
@code{(ice-9 stack-catch)} module. Both of these use a handler called
|
||||
@code{lazy-handler-dispatch} (defined in @file{boot-9.scm}), which you
|
||||
can hook into such that it calls GDS to display the stack when an
|
||||
exception occurs. To do this, use the @code{on-lazy-handler-dispatch}
|
||||
procedure as follows.
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(use-modules (ice-9 gds-client)
|
||||
(ice-9 debugging traps))
|
||||
(on-lazy-handler-dispatch gds-debug-trap)
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
After this the program will use GDS to display the stack whenever it
|
||||
hits an exception that is protected by a @code{lazy-catch} using
|
||||
@code{lazy-handler-dispatch}.
|
||||
|
||||
@subsubsection Accepting GDS Instructions at Any Time
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to setting an exception handler as described above, a
|
||||
Guile program can in principle set itself up to accept new
|
||||
instructions from GDS at any time, not just when it has stopped at an
|
||||
exception. This would allow the GDS user to evaluate code in the
|
||||
context of the running program, without having to wait for the program
|
||||
to stop first.
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(use-modules (ice-9 gds-client))
|
||||
(gds-accept-input #t)
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@code{gds-accept-input} causes the calling program to loop processing
|
||||
instructions from GDS, until GDS sends the @code{continue} instruction.
|
||||
This blocks the thread that calls it, however, so it will normally be
|
||||
more practical for the program to set up a dedicated GDS thread and call
|
||||
@code{gds-accept-input} from that thread.
|
||||
|
||||
For @code{select}-driven applications, an alternative approach would be
|
||||
for the GDS client code to provide an API which allowed the application
|
||||
to
|
||||
|
||||
@itemize
|
||||
@item
|
||||
discover the file descriptors (or Scheme ports) that are used for
|
||||
receiving instruction from the GDS front end, so that it could include
|
||||
these in its @code{select} call
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
call the GDS instruction handler when @code{select} indicated data
|
||||
available for reading on those descriptors/ports.
|
||||
@end itemize
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
This approach is not yet implemented, though.
|
||||
|
||||
@subsubsection Utility Guile Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
The ``utility'' Guile client mentioned above is a simple combination
|
||||
of the mechanisms that we have just described. In fact the code for
|
||||
the utility Guile client is essentially just this:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(use-modules (ice-9 gds-client))
|
||||
(named-module-use! '(guile-user) '(ice-9 session))
|
||||
(gds-accept-input #f))
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
The @code{named-module-use!} line ensures that the client can process
|
||||
@code{help} and @code{apropos} expressions, to implement lookups in
|
||||
Guile's online help. The @code{#f} parameter to
|
||||
@code{gds-accept-input} means that the @code{continue} instruction
|
||||
will not cause the instruction loop to exit, which makes sense here
|
||||
because the utility client has nothing to do except to process GDS
|
||||
instructions.
|
||||
|
||||
The utility client does not use @code{on-lazy-handler-dispatch} at its
|
||||
top level, because it has its own mechanism for catching and reporting
|
||||
exceptions in the code that it is asked to evaluate. This mechanism
|
||||
summarizes the exception and gives the user a button they can click to
|
||||
see the full stack, so the end result is very similar to what
|
||||
@code{on-lazy-handler-dispatch} provides. Deep inside
|
||||
@code{gds-accept-input}, in the part that handles evaluating
|
||||
expressions from Emacs, the GDS client code uses
|
||||
@code{throw->trap-context} and @code{gds-debug-trap} to implement
|
||||
this.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node Working with GDS in Scheme Buffers
|
||||
@subsection Working with GDS in Scheme Buffers
|
||||
|
||||
The following subsections describe the facilities and key sequences that
|
||||
GDS provides for working on code in @code{scheme-mode} buffers.
|
||||
|
||||
@menu
|
||||
* Access to Guile Help and Completion::
|
||||
* Evaluating Scheme Code::
|
||||
@end menu
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node Access to Guile Help and Completion
|
||||
@subsubsection Access to Guile Help and Completion
|
||||
|
||||
The following keystrokes provide fast and convenient access to Guile's
|
||||
built in help, and to completion with respect to the set of defined and
|
||||
accessible symbols.
|
||||
|
||||
@table @kbd
|
||||
@item C-h g
|
||||
@findex gds-help-symbol
|
||||
Get Guile help for a particular symbol, with the same results as if
|
||||
you had typed @code{(help SYMBOL)} into the Guile REPL
|
||||
(@code{gds-help-symbol}). The symbol to query defaults to the word at
|
||||
or before the cursor but can also be entered or edited in the
|
||||
minibuffer. The available help is popped up in a temporary Emacs
|
||||
window.
|
||||
|
||||
@item C-h G
|
||||
@findex gds-apropos
|
||||
List all accessible Guile symbols matching a given regular expression,
|
||||
with the same results as if you had typed @code{(apropos REGEXP)} into
|
||||
the Guile REPL (@code{gds-apropos}). The regexp to query defaults to
|
||||
the word at or before the cursor but can also be entered or edited in
|
||||
the minibuffer. The list of matching symbols is popped up in a
|
||||
temporary Emacs window.
|
||||
|
||||
@item M-@key{TAB}
|
||||
@findex gds-complete-symbol
|
||||
Try to complete the symbol at the cursor by matching it against the
|
||||
set of all defined and accessible bindings in the associated Guile
|
||||
process (@code{gds-complete-symbol}). If there are any extra
|
||||
characters that can be definitively added to the symbol at point, they
|
||||
are inserted. Otherwise, if there are any completions available, they
|
||||
are popped up in a temporary Emacs window, where one of them can be
|
||||
selected using either @kbd{@key{RET}} or the mouse.
|
||||
@end table
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node Evaluating Scheme Code
|
||||
@subsubsection Evaluating Scheme Code
|
||||
|
||||
The following keystrokes and commands provide various ways of sending
|
||||
code to a Guile client process for evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
@table @kbd
|
||||
@item M-C-x
|
||||
@findex gds-eval-defun
|
||||
Evaluate the ``top level defun'' that the cursor is in, in other words
|
||||
the smallest balanced expression which includes the cursor and whose
|
||||
opening parenthesis is in column 0 (@code{gds-eval-defun}).
|
||||
|
||||
@item C-x C-e
|
||||
@findex gds-eval-last-sexp
|
||||
Evaluate the expression that ends just before the cursor
|
||||
(@code{gds-eval-last-sexp}). This is designed so that it is easy to
|
||||
evaluate an expression that you have just finished typing.
|
||||
|
||||
@item C-c C-e
|
||||
@findex gds-eval-expression
|
||||
Read a Scheme expression using the minibuffer, and evaluate that
|
||||
expression (@code{gds-eval-expression}).
|
||||
|
||||
@item C-c C-r
|
||||
@findex gds-eval-region
|
||||
Evaluate the Scheme code in the marked region of the current buffer
|
||||
(@code{gds-eval-region}). Note that GDS does not check whether the
|
||||
region contains a balanced expression, or try to expand the region so
|
||||
that it does; it uses the region exactly as it is.
|
||||
@end table
|
||||
|
||||
If you type @kbd{C-u} before one of these commands, GDS will immediately
|
||||
pop up a Scheme stack buffer, showing the requested evaluation, so that
|
||||
you can single step through it. The Scheme stack display, and the
|
||||
options for continuing through the code, are described in the next two
|
||||
sections.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node Displaying the Scheme Stack
|
||||
@subsection Displaying the Scheme Stack
|
||||
|
||||
When you specify @code{gds-debug-trap} as the behaviour for a trap and
|
||||
the Guile program concerned hits that trap, GDS displays the stack and
|
||||
the relevant Scheme source code in Emacs, allowing you to explore the
|
||||
state of the program and then decide what to do next. The same
|
||||
applies if the program calls @code{(on-lazy-handler-dispatch
|
||||
gds-debug-trap)} and then throws an exception that passes through
|
||||
@code{lazy-handler-dispatch}, except that in this case you can only
|
||||
explore; it isn't possible to continue normal execution after an
|
||||
exception.
|
||||
|
||||
The following commands are available in the stack buffer for exploring
|
||||
the state of the program.
|
||||
|
||||
@table @asis
|
||||
@item @kbd{u}, @kbd{C-p}, @kbd{@key{up}}
|
||||
@findex gds-up
|
||||
Select the stack frame one up from the currently selected frame
|
||||
(@code{gds-up}). GDS displays stack frames with the innermost at the
|
||||
top, so moving ``up'' means selecting a more ``inner'' frame.
|
||||
|
||||
@item @kbd{d}, @kbd{C-n}, @kbd{@key{down}}
|
||||
@findex gds-down
|
||||
Select the stack frame one down from the currently selected frame
|
||||
(@code{gds-down}). GDS displays stack frames with the innermost at the
|
||||
top, so moving ``down'' means selecting a more ``outer'' frame.
|
||||
|
||||
@item @kbd{@key{RET}}
|
||||
@findex gds-select-stack-frame
|
||||
Select the stack frame at point (@code{gds-select-stack-frame}). This
|
||||
is useful after clicking somewhere in the stack trace with the mouse.
|
||||
@end table
|
||||
|
||||
Selecting a frame means that GDS will display the source code
|
||||
corresponding to that frame in the adjacent window, and that
|
||||
subsequent frame-sensitive commands, such as @code{gds-evaluate} (see
|
||||
below) and @code{gds-step-over} (@pxref{Continuing Execution}), will
|
||||
refer to that frame.
|
||||
|
||||
@table @kbd
|
||||
@item e
|
||||
@findex gds-evaluate
|
||||
Evaluate a variable or expression in the local environment of the
|
||||
selected stack frame (@code{gds-evaluate}). The result is displayed in
|
||||
the echo area.
|
||||
|
||||
@item I
|
||||
@findex gds-frame-info
|
||||
Show summary information about the selected stack frame
|
||||
(@code{gds-frame-info}). This includes what type of frame it is, the
|
||||
associated expression, and the frame's source location, if any.
|
||||
|
||||
@item A
|
||||
@findex gds-frame-args
|
||||
For an application frame, display the frame's arguments
|
||||
(@code{gds-frame-args}).
|
||||
|
||||
@item S
|
||||
@findex gds-proc-source
|
||||
For an application frame, show the Scheme source code of the procedure
|
||||
being called (@code{gds-proc-source}). The source code (where
|
||||
available) is displayed in the echo area.
|
||||
@end table
|
||||
|
||||
@kbd{S} (@code{gds-proc-source}) is useful when the procedure being
|
||||
called was created by an anonymous @code{(lambda @dots{})} expression.
|
||||
Such procedures appear in the stack trace as @code{<procedure #f
|
||||
(@dots{})>}, which doesn't give you much clue as to what will happen
|
||||
next. @kbd{S} will show you the procedure's code, which is usually
|
||||
enough for you to identify it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node Continuing Execution
|
||||
@subsection Continuing Execution
|
||||
|
||||
If it makes sense to continue execution from the stack which is being
|
||||
displayed, GDS provides the following further commands in the stack
|
||||
buffer.
|
||||
|
||||
@table @asis
|
||||
@item @kbd{g}, @kbd{c}, @kbd{q}
|
||||
@findex gds-go
|
||||
Tell the program to continue running (@code{gds-go}). It may of course
|
||||
stop again if it hits another trap, or another occurrence of the same
|
||||
trap.
|
||||
|
||||
The multiple keystrokes reflect that you can think of this as ``going'',
|
||||
``continuing'' or ``quitting'' (in the sense of quitting the GDS
|
||||
display).
|
||||
|
||||
@item @kbd{@key{SPC}}
|
||||
@findex gds-step-file
|
||||
Tell the program to do a single-step to the next entry or exit of a
|
||||
frame whose code comes from the same source file as the selected stack
|
||||
frame (@code{gds-step-file}).
|
||||
|
||||
In other words, you can hit @kbd{@key{SPC}} repeatedly to step through
|
||||
the code in a given file, automatically stepping @emph{over} any
|
||||
evaluations or procedure calls that use code from other files (or from
|
||||
no file).
|
||||
|
||||
If the selected stack frame has no source, the effect of this command is
|
||||
the same as that of @kbd{i}, described next.
|
||||
|
||||
@item @kbd{i}
|
||||
@findex gds-step-into
|
||||
Tell the debugged program to do a single-step to the next frame entry or
|
||||
exit of any kind (@code{gds-step-into}). @kbd{i} therefore steps
|
||||
through code at the most detailed level possible.
|
||||
|
||||
@item @kbd{o}
|
||||
@findex gds-step-over
|
||||
Tell the debugged program to continue running until the selected stack
|
||||
frame completes, and then to display its result (@code{gds-step-over}).
|
||||
Note that the program may stop before then if it hits another trap; in
|
||||
this case the trap telling it to stop when the marked frame completes
|
||||
remains in place and so will still fire at the appropriate point.
|
||||
@end table
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node Associating Buffers with Clients
|
||||
@subsection Associating Buffers with Clients
|
||||
|
||||
The first time that you use one of GDS's evaluation, help or completion
|
||||
commands from a given Scheme mode buffer, GDS will ask which Guile
|
||||
client program you want to use for the operation, or if you want to
|
||||
start up a new ``utility'' client. After that GDS considers the buffer
|
||||
to be ``associated'' with the selected client, and so sends all further
|
||||
requests to that client, but you can override this by explicitly
|
||||
associating the buffer with a different client, or by removing the
|
||||
default association.
|
||||
|
||||
@table @kbd
|
||||
@item M-x gds-associate-buffer
|
||||
Associate (or re-associate) the current buffer with a particular Guile
|
||||
client program. The available clients are listed, and you can also
|
||||
choose to start up a new ``utility'' client for this buffer to associate
|
||||
with.
|
||||
|
||||
@item M-x gds-dissociate-buffer
|
||||
Dissociate the current buffer from its client, if any. This means that
|
||||
the next time you use an evaluation, help or completion command, GDS
|
||||
will ask you again which client to send the request to.
|
||||
@end table
|
||||
|
||||
When a buffer is associated with a client program, the buffer's modeline
|
||||
shows whether the client is currently able to accept instruction from
|
||||
GDS. This is done by adding one of the following suffixes to the
|
||||
``Scheme'' major mode indicator:
|
||||
|
||||
@table @asis
|
||||
@item :ready
|
||||
The client program (or one of its threads, if multithreaded) is
|
||||
currently ready to accept instruction from GDS. In other words, if you
|
||||
send it a help or evaluation request, you should see the result pretty
|
||||
much immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
@item :running
|
||||
The client program is not currently able to accept instruction from
|
||||
GDS. This means that it (or all of its threads, if multithreaded) is
|
||||
busy, or waiting for input other than from GDS.
|
||||
|
||||
@item :debug
|
||||
The client program (or one of its threads, if multithreaded) is stopped
|
||||
in ``debugging mode'' with GDS displaying the stack for a trap or
|
||||
exception. It is waiting for instruction from GDS on what to do next.
|
||||
@end table
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@node An Example GDS Session
|
||||
@subsection An Example GDS Session
|
||||
|
||||
Create a file, @file{testgds.scm} say, for experimenting with GDS and
|
||||
Scheme code, and type this into it:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(use-modules (ice-9 debugging traps)
|
||||
(ice-9 gds-client)
|
||||
(ice-9 debugging example-fns))
|
||||
(install-trap (make <procedure-trap>
|
||||
#:behaviour gds-debug-trap
|
||||
#:procedure fact1))
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
Now select all of this code and type @kbd{C-c C-r} to send the selected
|
||||
region to Guile for evaluation. GDS will ask you which Guile process to
|
||||
use; unless you know that you already have another Guile application
|
||||
running and connected to GDS, choose the ``Start a new Guile'' option,
|
||||
which starts one of the ``utility'' processes described in @ref{GDS
|
||||
Getting Started}.
|
||||
|
||||
The results of the evaluation pop up in a window like this:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(use-modules (ice-9 debugging traps)\n @dots{}
|
||||
|
||||
;;; Evaluating subexpression 1 in current module (guile-user)
|
||||
@result{} no (or unspecified) value
|
||||
|
||||
;;; Evaluating subexpression 2 in current module (guile-user)
|
||||
@result{} no (or unspecified) value
|
||||
|
||||
--:** *Guile Evaluation* (Scheme:ready)--All------------
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
this tells you that the evaluation was successful but that the return
|
||||
values were unspecified. Its effect was to load a module of example
|
||||
functions and set a trap on one of these functions, @code{fact1}, that
|
||||
calculates the factorial of its argument.
|
||||
|
||||
If you now call @code{fact1}, you can see the trap and GDS's stack
|
||||
display in action. To do this add
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
(fact1 4)
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
@noindent
|
||||
to your @file{testgds.scm} buffer and type @kbd{C-x C-e} (which
|
||||
evaluates the expression that the cursor is just after the end of).
|
||||
The result should be that a GDS stack window like the following
|
||||
appears:
|
||||
|
||||
@lisp
|
||||
Calling procedure:
|
||||
=> s [fact1 4]
|
||||
s [primitive-eval (fact1 4)]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--:** PID 28729 (Guile-Debug)--All------------
|
||||
@end lisp
|
||||
|
||||
This stack tells you that Guile is about to call the @code{fact1}
|
||||
procedure, with argument 4, and you can step through this call in
|
||||
detail by pressing @kbd{i} once and then @kbd{@key{SPC}}
|
||||
(@pxref{Continuing Execution}).
|
||||
|
||||
(@kbd{i} is needed as the first keystroke rather than @kbd{@key{SPC}},
|
||||
because the aim here is to step through code in the @code{(ice-9
|
||||
debugging example-fns)} module, whose source file is
|
||||
@file{@dots{}/ice-9/debugging/example-fns.scm}, but the initial
|
||||
@code{(fact1 4)} call comes from the Guile session, whose ``source
|
||||
file'' Guile presents as @file{standard input}. If the user starts by
|
||||
pressing @kbd{@key{SPC}} instead of @kbd{i}, the effect is that the
|
||||
program runs until it hits the first recursive call @code{(fact1 (- n
|
||||
1))}, where it stops because of the trap on @code{fact1} firing again.
|
||||
At this point, the source file @emph{is}
|
||||
@file{@dots{}/ice-9/debugging/example-fns.scm}, because the recursive
|
||||
@code{(fact1 (- n 1))} call comes from code in that file, so further
|
||||
pressing of @kbd{@key{SPC}} successfully single-steps through this
|
||||
file.)
|
||||
See Geiser's web page at @uref{http://www.nongnu.org/geiser/}, for more
|
||||
information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@c Local Variables:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue