From 820381bc7fd7d6ff4efe070853190d4b48bc5fc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark H Weaver Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 04:40:33 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix and combine NEWS entries on `infinite?' and `finite?' * NEWS: Fix and combine NEWS entries on `infinite?' and `finite?'. Previous, they stated that these predicates now work on non-real complex numbers, but that is not the case. --- NEWS | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 3770cdea1..2ba79a65a 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -186,15 +186,8 @@ remainder operators' for more information. **** `infinite?' changes -`infinite?' now returns #t for non-real complex infinities, and throws -exceptions for non-numbers. (Note that NaNs _are_ considered numbers -by scheme, despite their name). - -**** `finite?' changes - -`finite?' now returns #f for NaNs and non-real complex infinities, and -throws exceptions for non-numbers. (Note that NaNs _are_ considered -numbers by scheme, despite their name). +`infinite?' and `finite?' now throw exceptions for non-numbers. (Note +that NaNs _are_ considered numbers by scheme, despite their name). **** `real-valued?', `rational-valued?' and `integer-valued?' changes