From 86d185bae3b6c022d44deed540fae93496bf4bdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 03:09:57 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix spelling error. --- doc/scheme-data.texi | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/scheme-data.texi b/doc/scheme-data.texi index 0e754a854..4e43a4580 100755 --- a/doc/scheme-data.texi +++ b/doc/scheme-data.texi @@ -3191,11 +3191,9 @@ Like @code{delete!}, but only deletes the first occurrence of @node List Searching @subsection List Searching -@c FIXME::martin: Review me! - The following procedures search lists for particular elements. They use different comparison predicates for comparing list elements with the -object to be seached. When they fail, they return @code{#f}, otherwise +object to be searched. When they fail, they return @code{#f}, otherwise they return the sublist whose car is equal to the search object, where equality depends on the equality predicate used. @@ -3229,7 +3227,7 @@ the non-empty lists returned by @code{(list-tail @var{lst} empty list) is returned. @end deffn -[FIXME: is there any reason to have the `sloppy' functions available at +[FIXME: Is there any reason to have the `sloppy' functions available at high level at all? Maybe these docs should be relegated to a "Guile Internals" node or something. -twp]