This fixes a compiler issue where (uniform-array->bytevector #2f64())
failed because of the stricter definition of uniform-vector? on this branch.
Perhaps it would be better if uniform-array->bytevector didn't require
a contiguous argument.
* libguile/arrays.c: (scm_array_contents): return the root regardless of
the value of SCM_I_ARRAY_DIMS (ra)->inc.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: check.
* libguile/arrays.c (scm_array_contents): Branch cases not on
scm_is_generalized_vector but on SCM_I_ARRAYP. Thus lbnd!=0, which
could happen with scm_is_generalized_vector, never appears in the
output.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: Test array-contents.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: move array-copy! tests to ramap.test.
* test-suite/tests/ramap.test: check the dissimilar matching behavior of
array-copy! and array-map! with arguments of different size.
This commit also renames uniform-vector-element-type-code to
array-type-code.
Conflicts:
libguile/uniform.c
libguile/uniform.h
test-suite/tests/arrays.test
* libguile/uniform.h:
* libguile/uniform.c (scm_is_uniform_vector, scm_uniform_vector_p)
(scm_c_uniform_vector_length, scm_uniform_vector_length)
(scm_uniform_vector_element_type, scm_uniform_vector_element_size)
(scm_c_uniform_vector_ref, scm_uniform_vector_ref):
(scm_c_uniform_vector_set_x, scm_uniform_vector_set_x):
(scm_uniform_vector_to_list)
(scm_uniform_vector_elements, scm_uniform_vector_writable_elements):
Deprecate. This interface lacked both generality and specificity.
The general replacement is array-length, array-ref, and friends on the
scheme side, or the array handle interface on the C side. On the
specific side of things, there are the specific bytevector, srfi-4,
and bitvector interfaces.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test:
* test-suite/tests/bitvectors.test:
* test-suite/tests/ports.test:
* test-suite/tests/srfi-4.test: Update to use array interfaces.
* doc/ref/api-foreign.texi (Void Pointers and Byte Access):
* doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI-4): Update.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: dependence reordering: first sanity, then
make-array, then array-equal?, then make-shared-array, shared-array-root,
then the rest, many of which use make-shared-array.
* libguile/arrays.c (scm_transpose_array)
- Use scm_c_array_rank(), which contains an implicit is_array test.
- Handle the rank 0 case.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test
- Add test for rank 0 case.
- Add failure test for non array argument.
* libguile/uniform.c (scm_is_uniform_vector): Replace
scm_is_generalized_vector and scm_generalized_vector_get_handle by
scm_is_array and manual rank check.
(scm_c_uniform_vector_length): Use scm_c_array_length.
(scm_c_uniform_vector_ref): Use scm_c_array_ref_1.
(scm_c_uniform_vector_set): Use scm_c_array_set_1_x.
(scm_uniform_vector_writable_elements): Use scm_array_get_handle, and
assert that the rank is 1.
* test-suite/test/arrays.test: Rename the uniform-vector-ref block to
uniform-vector. Exercise uniform-vector-length and shared arrays
remaining uniform.
Modifications by Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>.
* libguile/array-map.c: new function rafill, like scm_array_fill_int,
but factors GVSET out of the loop. Use it in scm_array_fill_x instead of
scm_array_fill_int.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: add test for array-fill! with stride != 1.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
* libguile/array-handle.c (scm_array_handle_pos_1):
(scm_array_handle_pos_2): New functions.
* libguile/generalized-arrays.c (scm_c_array_ref_1, scm_c_array_ref_2):
(scm_c_array_set_1_x, scm_c_array_set_2_x): New functions.
(scm_i_array_ref, scm_i_array_set_x): New subr bindings for array-ref
and array-set! that avoid consing for arrays of rank 1 or 2.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test ("array-set!"): Fix expected exception
for wrong number of indices.
Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/12465>.
Reported by Daniel Llorens <daniel.llorens@bluewin.ch>.
* libguile/generalized-vectors.c (scm_generalized_vector_to_list): Fix
initial value of POS; pass the `h.base + pos', not just `pos' as the
`vref' argument.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test ("array->list")["http://bugs.gnu.org/12465
- ok", "http://bugs.gnu.org/12465 - bad]: New tests.
("generalized-vector->list"): New test prefix.
* libguile/generalized-vectors.c (scm_c_generalized_vector_ref):
(scm_c_generalized_vector_set_x): Fix for the case in which base was
not 1, lbnd was not 0, or inc was not 1.
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test (array): Add a test. Thanks to Daniel
Llorens for the report.
* libguile/array-map.c (array_compare, scm_array_equal_p): Rewrite as
something that operates on the generic array handle infrastructure.
Based on array->list.
(scm_i_array_equal_p): Change the docs, as array-equal? is now the same
as equal?, except that it typechecks its args.
* doc/ref/api-compound.texi (Array Procedures): Update array-equal?
docs.
* libguile/deprecated.h:
* libguile/deprecated.c (scm_raequal): Deprecate.
* libguile/bytevectors.c (scm_bytevector_eq_p): Bugfix: bytevectors are
bytevector=? only if their element type is the same.
* libguile/eq.c (scm_equal_p): Only dispatch to scm_array_equal_p if
both args are arrays (generically).
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test ("equal?"): Add some more tests.
OK let's try again. While the thanks go to Daniel Llorens del Río for
the tip, the blame continues going to me :)
* test-suite/Makefile.am:
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: Add a test.
* libguile/array-map.c (raeql): Handle a few 0-dimensional cases. If the
shapes of the arrays don't match, just return #f instead of raising
an error.
* libguile/eq.c (scm_equal_p): Only call scm_array_equal_p if both
arguments are generalized arrays; otherwise they are not equal. Thanks
to Daniel Llorens del Río for the tip.
* test-suite/Makefile.am:
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: Add a test.
