* libguile/array-map.c (array_compare, scm_array_equal_p): Rewrite as
something that operates on the generic array handle infrastructure.
Based on array->list.
(scm_i_array_equal_p): Change the docs, as array-equal? is now the same
as equal?, except that it typechecks its args.
* doc/ref/api-compound.texi (Array Procedures): Update array-equal?
docs.
* libguile/deprecated.h:
* libguile/deprecated.c (scm_raequal): Deprecate.
* libguile/bytevectors.c (scm_bytevector_eq_p): Bugfix: bytevectors are
bytevector=? only if their element type is the same.
* libguile/eq.c (scm_equal_p): Only dispatch to scm_array_equal_p if
both args are arrays (generically).
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test ("equal?"): Add some more tests.
OK let's try again. While the thanks go to Daniel Llorens del Río for
the tip, the blame continues going to me :)
* test-suite/Makefile.am:
* test-suite/tests/arrays.test: Add a test.
* libguile/array-map.c (raeql): Handle a few 0-dimensional cases. If the
shapes of the arrays don't match, just return #f instead of raising
an error.
* libguile/root.h
* libguile/root.c (scm_sys_protects): It used to be that for some reason
we'd define a special array of "protected" values. This was a little
silly, always, but with the BDW GC it's completely unnecessary. Also
many of these variables were unused, and none of them were good API.
So remove this array, and either eliminate, make static, or make
internal the various values.
* libguile/snarf.h: No need to generate calls to scm_permanent_object.
* guile-readline/readline.c (scm_init_readline): No need to call
scm_permanent_object.
* libguile/array-map.c (ramap, rafe): Remove the dubious nullvect
optimizations.
* libguile/async.c (scm_init_async): No need to init scm_asyncs, it is
no more.
* libguile/eval.c (scm_init_eval): No need to init scm_listofnull, it is
no more.
* libguile/gc.c: Make scm_protects a static var.
(scm_storage_prehistory): Change the sanity check to use the address
of protects.
(scm_init_gc_protect_object): No need to clear the scm_sys_protects,
as it is no more.
* libguile/keywords.c: Make the keyword obarray a static var.
* libguile/numbers.c: Make flo0 a static var.
* libguile/objprop.c: Make object_whash a static var.
* libguile/properties.c: Make properties_whash a static var.
* libguile/srcprop.h:
* libguile/srcprop.c: Make scm_source_whash a global with internal
linkage.
* libguile/strings.h:
* libguile/strings.c: Make scm_nullstr a global with internal linkage.
* libguile/vectors.c (scm_init_vectors): No need to init scm_nullvect,
it's unused.
* libguile/tags.h: Remove rpsubrs (I chose to interpret the terse name
as "recursive predicate subrs"). Just use gsubrs with rest arguments,
or do a fold yourself.
* libguile/array-map.c (scm_i_array_equal_p): Do the comparison in
order, why not.
* libguile/chars.c:
* libguile/eq.c:
* libguile/numbers.c:
* libguile/strorder.c: Add 0,2,1 gsubr wrappers for rpsubrs like eq?, <,
etc.
* libguile/goops.c (scm_class_of)
* libguile/procprop.c (scm_i_procedure_arity)
* libguile/procs.c (scm_thunk_p)
* libguile/vm.c (apply_foreign): Remove rpsubr cases.
* test-suite/tests/numbers.test ("=", "<"): Turn a couple xfails into
passes.
* libguile/tags.h (scm_tcs_subrs, scm_tc7_asubr): Remove definitions.
* libguile/goops.c (scm_class_of)
* libguile/procprop.c (scm_i_procedure_arity)
* libguile/procs.c (scm_thunk_p)
* libguile/vm.c (apply_foreign): Remove cases for asubrs.
* libguile/array-map.c: Gut all of the optimizations, because there are
no more asubrs, soon won't be rpsubrs, and all of this should happen
on the Scheme level, ideally.
* libguile/tags.h: Remove scm_tc7_dsubr. There are no more users of
this.
* libguile/array-map.c:
* libguile/eval.c:
* libguile/eval.i.c:
* libguile/goops.c:
* libguile/procprop.c:
* libguile/procs.h: Remove all dsubr cases.
* libguile/tags.h: Remove tc7 #defines for subrs, replacing them with
placeholders. These were public, but hopfully unused. I don't see how
to usefully deprecate them.
* libguile/array-map.c (scm_array_map_x): Remove special cases for
certain subr types. This might make things slower for the moment,
otoh, native compilation should moot that question.
* libguile/eval.i.c:
* libguile/eval.c: Remove subr-handling cases. To regain this speed and
more won't have to wait for native compilation, though -- this change
smooths the way for subr dispatch in the VM.
* libguile/gsubr.c (scm_i_gsubr_apply): Fix a bug in which we didn't
detect too-many-arguments. This would only show up when using ceval,
as only ceval called this function.
* test-suite/tests/ramap.test ("array-map!"): Change the expected
exception if passed a procedure of the wrong arity. It now gives
wrong-num-args.
more won't have to wait for native compilation, though -- this change
smooths the way for subr dispatch in the VM.
* libguile/goops.c (scm_class_of): Remove subr cases. No speed
implication.
* libguile/objects.c (scm_valid_object_procedure_p): Remove this public
but undocumented, and useless, function. I do not think this will
affect anyone at all.
(scm_set_object_procedure_x): Replace a call to
scm_valid_object_procedure_p with scm_procedure_p, and actually wrap
with a scm_is_true.
* module/oop/goops.scm (initialize-object-procedure): Don't call
valid-object-procedure?.
* libguile/Makefile.am:
* libguile/vectors.c:
* libguile/vectors.h:
* libguile/generalized-vectors.c:
* libguile/generalized-vectors.h: Move generic vector ops off into their
own file too. The implementation is now based on the generic
array-handle infrastructure.
* libguile.h:
* libguile/array-map.c:
* libguile/bitvectors.c:
* libguile/random.c:
* libguile/srfi-4.c: Update includers.
* libguile/arrays.h:
* libguile/arrays.c:
* libguile/generalized-arrays.h:
* libguile/generalized-arrays.c: Move some generic functionality out of
arrays.c to a new file.
* libguile/array-map.c:
* libguile/deprecated.c:
* libguile/init.c: Update includers.
* libguile/arrays.h:
* libguile/array-map.c:
* libguile/arrays.c:
* libguile/deprecated.c: Remove "enclosed arrays". The only user-facing
procedures that this affects are scm_enclose_array / enclose-array. If
enclosed arrays are added back, it should be through the generic array
interface; but really, it sounds like something that would be better
implemented in Scheme.
