* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm (condition): Use 'make-exception' instead of
'make-compound-condition', which is unbound in this module.
* test-suite/tests/srfi-35.test ("syntax")["compound condition,
hygienic macro expansion"]: New test.
Previously we'd get warnings like:
t.scm:11:0: warning: shadows previous definition of `unused-constructor-51900bdce47d50c' at /tmp/t.scm:6:0
whenever 'define-condition-type' appeared more than once in a source
file.
* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm (define-condition-type): Rewrite as
'syntax-case' and generate UNUSED-CONSTRUCTOR as a function of TYPE.
* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm: Import (ice-9 match), and remove now-unused
srfi-1 import.
(print-condition): Print more like records, as appears to be the
intention.
(&condition): Define using make-record-type. Adapt all callers.
Also, compound conditions are now a disjoint type, handled specially
by condition-ref, condition?, and so on.
* test-suite/tests/srfi-35.test (v3): Fix an error in which a
subcondition was initialized without initializers for all of its
fields.
* libguile/struct.h (SCM_VTABLE_BASE_LAYOUT): Layout is a "pr" field.
* module/ice-9/boot-9.scm (record-type-vtable): Record vtable fields are
writable.
(<parameter>): "pw" fields.
* module/oop/goops.scm (<class>, %compute-layout): <read-only> fields
are "pw" underneath.
* module/rnrs/records/procedural.scm (record-type-vtable)
(record-constructor-vtable, make-record-type-descriptor): Use "pw"
fields in vtables.
* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm (%condition-type-vtable)
(struct-layout-for-condition): "pw" fields in vtables.
* test-suite/tests/goops.test:
* test-suite/tests/structs.test: Use "pw" fields only.
* benchmark-suite/benchmarks/structs.bm: Update for make-struct/no-tail,
to use pw fields, and also to remove useless tests that the compiler
would optimize away.
* doc/ref/api-data.texi (Vtables): Add a note about the now-vestigial
permissions character and update documentation.
(Structure Basics, Meta-Vtables): Update examples.
* libguile/hash.c (scm_i_struct_hash): Remove code that would handle
opaque/self fields.
* libguile/print.h (SCM_PRINT_STATE_LAYOUT): Use "pw" fields.
* libguile/struct.c (scm_struct_init): Simplify check for hidden
fields.
* libguile/values.c (scm_init_values): Field is "pw".
* libguile/struct.h (SCM_VTABLE_BASE_LAYOUT, scm_vtable_index_self):
Remove "self" field. Renumber the other fields.
* module/oop/goops.scm (<self-slot>): Remove.
(fold-class-slots): Adapt for "self" slot removal. Adapt all users.
(class-redefinition): Now that there is no "self" slot to update, use
%modify-instance instead of %modify-class.
* libguile/goops.c (class_self): Remove.
(scm_sys_modify_class): Remove.
* libguile/goops.h (scm_sys_modify_class): Remove.
* module/rnrs/records/procedural.scm: Import vtable-offset-user.
Renumber rtd indexes using vtable-offset-user.
* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm (%condition-type-vtable): Remove mention of
vtable fields.
* module/system/base/types.scm (address->inferior-struct): Adapt for
different vtable field layout.
* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm (%make-condition-type): New procedure.
(make-condition-type, make-compound-condition-type): Use it.
* test-suite/tests/srfi-35.test ("condition
types")["struct-vtable-name"]: New test.
* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm: Use `(ice-9 syncase)'.
(define-condition-type, condition): Rewritten using `syntax-rules'.
(compound-condition, condition-instantiation): New helper internal
macros. Thanks to Andy Wingo for his help!
