@c -*-texinfo-*- @c This is part of the GNU Guile Reference Manual. @c Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 @c Free Software Foundation, Inc. @c See the file guile.texi for copying conditions. @page @node Foreign Function Interface @section Foreign Function Interface @cindex foreign function interface @cindex ffi The more one hacks in Scheme, the more one realizes that there are actually two computational worlds: one which is warm and alive, that land of parentheses, and one cold and dead, the land of C and its ilk. But yet we as programmers live in both worlds, and Guile itself is half implemented in C. So it is that Guile's living half pays respect to its dead counterpart, via a spectrum of interfaces to C ranging from dynamic loading of Scheme primitives to dynamic binding of stock C library prodedures. @menu * Foreign Libraries:: Dynamically linking to libraries. * Foreign Functions:: Simple calls to C procedures. * C Extensions:: Extending Guile in C with loadable modules. * Modules and Extensions:: Loading C extensions into modules. * Foreign Values:: Accessing global variables. * Dynamic FFI:: Fu. @end menu @node Foreign Libraries @subsection Foreign Libraries Most modern Unices have something called @dfn{shared libraries}. This ordinarily means that they have the capability to share the executable image of a library between several running programs to save memory and disk space. But generally, shared libraries give a lot of additional flexibility compared to the traditional static libraries. In fact, calling them `dynamic' libraries is as correct as calling them `shared'. Shared libraries really give you a lot of flexibility in addition to the memory and disk space savings. When you link a program against a shared library, that library is not closely incorporated into the final executable. Instead, the executable of your program only contains enough information to find the needed shared libraries when the program is actually run. Only then, when the program is starting, is the final step of the linking process performed. This means that you need not recompile all programs when you install a new, only slightly modified version of a shared library. The programs will pick up the changes automatically the next time they are run. Now, when all the necessary machinery is there to perform part of the linking at run-time, why not take the next step and allow the programmer to explicitly take advantage of it from within his program? Of course, many operating systems that support shared libraries do just that, and chances are that Guile will allow you to access this feature from within your Scheme programs. As you might have guessed already, this feature is called @dfn{dynamic linking}.@footnote{Some people also refer to the final linking stage at program startup as `dynamic linking', so if you want to make yourself perfectly clear, it is probably best to use the more technical term @dfn{dlopening}, as suggested by Gordon Matzigkeit in his libtool documentation.} We titled this section ``foreign libraries'' because although the name ``foreign'' doesn't leak into the API, the world of C really is foreign to Scheme -- and that estrangement extends to components of foreign libraries as well, as we see in future sections. @deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-link [library] @deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_link (library) Find the shared library denoted by @var{library} (a string) and link it into the running Guile application. When everything works out, return a Scheme object suitable for representing the linked object file. Otherwise an error is thrown. How object files are searched is system dependent. Normally, @var{library} is just the name of some shared library file that will be searched for in the places where shared libraries usually reside, such as in @file{/usr/lib} and @file{/usr/local/lib}. When @var{library} is omitted, a @dfn{global symbol handle} is returned. This handle provides access to the symbols available to the program at run-time, including those exported by the program itself and the shared libraries already loaded. @end deffn @deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-object? obj @deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_object_p (obj) Return @code{#t} if @var{obj} is a dynamic library handle, or @code{#f} otherwise. @end deffn @deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-unlink dobj @deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_unlink (dobj) Unlink the indicated object file from the application. The argument @var{dobj} must have been obtained by a call to @code{dynamic-link}. After @code{dynamic-unlink} has been called on @var{dobj}, its content is no longer accessible. @end deffn @smallexample (define libc-obj (dynamic-link "libc.so")) libc-obj @result{} # (dynamic-args-call 'rand libc-obj '()) @result{} 269167349 (dynamic-unlink libc-obj) libc-obj @result{} # @end smallexample As you can see, after calling @code{dynamic-unlink} on a dynamically linked library, it is marked as @samp{(unlinked)} and you are no longer able to use it with @code{dynamic-call}, etc. Whether the library is really removed from you program is system-dependent and will generally not happen when some other parts of your program still use it. In the example above, @code{libc} is almost certainly not removed from your program because it is badly needed by almost everything. When dynamic linking is disabled or not supported on your system, the above functions throw errors, but they are still available. @node Foreign Functions @subsection Foreign Functions @deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-func name dobj @deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_func (name, dobj) Return a ``handle'' for the func @var{name} in the shared object referred to by @var{dobj}. The handle can be passed to @code{dynamic-call} to actually call the function. Regardless whether your C compiler prepends an underscore @samp{_} to the global names in a program, you should @strong{not} include this underscore in @var{name} since it will be added automatically when necessary. @end deffn @deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-call func dobj @deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_call (func, dobj) Call the C function indicated by @var{func} and @var{dobj}. The function is passed no arguments and its return value is ignored. When @var{function} is something returned by @code{dynamic-func}, call that function and ignore @var{dobj}. When @var{func} is a string , look it up in @var{dynobj}; this is equivalent to @smallexample (dynamic-call (dynamic-func @var{func} @var{dobj}) #f) @end smallexample Interrupts are deferred while the C function is executing (with @code{SCM_DEFER_INTS}/@code{SCM_ALLOW_INTS}). @end deffn @deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-args-call func dobj args @deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_args_call (func, dobj, args) Call the C function indicated by @var{func} and @var{dobj}, just like @code{dynamic-call}, but pass it some arguments and return its return value. The C function is expected to take two arguments and return an @code{int}, just like @code{main}: @smallexample int c_func (int argc, char **argv); @end smallexample The parameter @var{args} must be a list of strings and is converted into an array of @code{char *}. The array is passed in @var{argv} and its size in @var{argc}. The return value is converted to a Scheme number and returned from the call to @code{dynamic-args-call}. @end deffn The functions to call a function from a dynamically linked library, @code{dynamic-call} and @code{dynamic-args-call}, are not very powerful. They are mostly intended to be used for calling specially written initialization functions that will then add new primitives to Guile. For example, we do not expect that you will dynamically link @file{libX11} with @code{dynamic-link} and then construct a beautiful graphical user interface just by using @code{dynamic-call} and @code{dynamic-args-call}. Instead, the usual way would be to write a special Guile<->X11 glue library that has intimate knowledge about both Guile and X11 and does whatever is necessary to make them inter-operate smoothly. This glue library could then be dynamically linked into a vanilla Guile interpreter and activated by calling its initialization function. That function would add all the new types and primitives to the Guile interpreter that it has to offer. From this setup the next logical step is to integrate these glue libraries into the module system of Guile so that you can load new primitives into a running system just as you can load new Scheme code. [foreshadowing regarding dynamic ffi] @deffn {Scheme Procedure} load-extension lib init @deffnx {C Function} scm_load_extension (lib, init) Load and initialize the extension designated by LIB and INIT. When there is no pre-registered function for LIB/INIT, this is equivalent to @lisp (dynamic-call INIT (dynamic-link LIB)) @end lisp When there is a pre-registered function, that function is called instead. Normally, there is no pre-registered function. This option exists only for situations where dynamic linking is unavailable or unwanted. In that case, you would statically link your program with the desired library, and register its init function right after Guile has been initialized. LIB should be a string denoting a shared library without any file type suffix such as ".so". The suffix is provided automatically. It should also not contain any directory components. Libraries that implement Guile Extensions should be put into the normal locations for shared libraries. We recommend to use the naming convention libguile-bla-blum for a extension related to a module `(bla blum)'. The normal way for a extension to be used is to write a small Scheme file that defines a module, and to load the extension into this module. When the module is auto-loaded, the extension is loaded as well. For example, @lisp (define-module (bla blum)) (load-extension "libguile-bla-blum" "bla_init_blum") @end lisp @end deffn @node C Extensions @subsection C Extensions The most interesting application of dynamically linked libraries is probably to use them for providing @emph{compiled code modules} to Scheme programs. As much fun as programming in Scheme is, every now and then comes the need to write some low-level C stuff to make Scheme even more fun. Not only can you put these new primitives into their own module (see the previous section), you can even put them into a shared library that is only then linked to your running Guile image when it is actually needed. An example will hopefully make everything clear. Suppose we want to make the Bessel functions of the C library available to Scheme in the module @samp{(math bessel)}. First we need to write the appropriate glue code to convert the arguments and return values of the functions from Scheme to C and back. Additionally, we need a function that will add them to the set of Guile primitives. Because this is just an example, we will only implement this for the @code{j0} function. @smallexample #include #include SCM j0_wrapper (SCM x) @{ return scm_from_double (j0 (scm_to_double (x, "j0"))); @} void init_math_bessel () @{ scm_c_define_gsubr ("j0", 1, 0, 0, j0_wrapper); @} @end smallexample We can already try to bring this into action by manually calling the low level functions for performing dynamic linking. The C source file needs to be compiled into a shared library. Here is how to do it on GNU/Linux, please refer to the @code{libtool} documentation for how to create dynamically linkable libraries portably. @smallexample gcc -shared -o libbessel.so -fPIC bessel.c @end smallexample Now fire up Guile: @lisp (define bessel-lib (dynamic-link "./libbessel.so")) (dynamic-call "init_math_bessel" bessel-lib) (j0 2) @result{} 0.223890779141236 @end lisp The filename @file{./libbessel.so} should be pointing to the shared library produced with the @code{gcc} command above, of course. The second line of the Guile interaction will call the @code{init_math_bessel} function which in turn will register the C function @code{j0_wrapper} with the Guile interpreter under the name @code{j0}. This function becomes immediately available and we can call it from Scheme. Fun, isn't it? But we are only half way there. This is what @code{apropos} has to say about @code{j0}: @smallexample (apropos "j0") @print{} (guile-user): j0 # @end smallexample As you can see, @code{j0} is contained in the root module, where all the other Guile primitives like @code{display}, etc live. In general, a primitive is put into whatever module is the @dfn{current module} at the time @code{scm_c_define_gsubr} is called. A compiled module should have a specially named @dfn{module init function}. Guile knows about this special name and will call that function automatically after having linked in the shared library. For our example, we replace @code{init_math_bessel} with the following code in @file{bessel.c}: @smallexample void init_math_bessel (void *unused) @{ scm_c_define_gsubr ("j0", 1, 0, 0, j0_wrapper); scm_c_export ("j0", NULL); @} void scm_init_math_bessel_module () @{ scm_c_define_module ("math bessel", init_math_bessel, NULL); @} @end smallexample The general pattern for the name of a module init function is: @samp{scm_init_}, followed by the name of the module where the individual hierarchical components are concatenated with underscores, followed by @samp{_module}. After @file{libbessel.so} has been rebuilt, we need to place the shared library into the right place. Once the module has been correctly installed, it should be possible to use it like this: @smallexample guile> (load-extension "./libbessel.so" "scm_init_math_bessel_module") guile> (use-modules (math bessel)) guile> (j0 2) 0.223890779141236 guile> (apropos "j0") @print{} (math bessel): j0 # @end smallexample That's it! @deffn {Scheme Procedure} load-extension lib init @deffnx {C Function} scm_load_extension (lib, init) Load and initialize the extension designated by LIB and INIT. When there is no pre-registered function for LIB/INIT, this is equivalent to @lisp (dynamic-call INIT (dynamic-link LIB)) @end lisp When there is a pre-registered function, that function is called instead. Normally, there is no pre-registered function. This option exists only for situations where dynamic linking is unavailable or unwanted. In that case, you would statically link your program with the desired library, and register its init function right after Guile has been initialized. LIB should be a string denoting a shared library without any file type suffix such as ".so". The suffix is provided automatically. It should also not contain any directory components. Libraries that implement Guile Extensions should be put into the normal locations for shared libraries. We recommend to use the naming convention libguile-bla-blum for a extension related to a module `(bla blum)'. The normal way for a extension to be used is to write a small Scheme file that defines a module, and to load the extension into this module. When the module is auto-loaded, the extension is loaded as well. For example, @lisp (define-module (bla blum)) (load-extension "libguile-bla-blum" "bla_init_blum") @end lisp @end deffn @node Modules and Extensions @subsection Modules and Extensions The new primitives that you add to Guile with @code{scm_c_define_gsubr} (@pxref{Primitive Procedures}) or with any of the other mechanisms are placed into the module that is current when the @code{scm_c_define_gsubr} is executed. Extensions loaded from the REPL, for example, will be placed into the @code{(guile-user)} module, if the REPL module was not changed. To define C primitives within a specific module, the simplest way is: @example (define-module (foo bar)) (load-extension "foobar-c-code" "foo_bar_init") @end example When loaded with @code{(use-modules (foo bar))}, the @code{load-extension} call looks for the @file{foobar-c-code.so} (etc) object file in the standard system locations, such as @file{/usr/lib} or @file{/usr/local/lib}. If someone installs your module to a non-standard location then the object file won't be found. You can address this by inserting the install location in the @file{foo/bar.scm} file. This is convenient for the user and also guarantees the intended object is read, even if stray older or newer versions are in the loader's path. The usual way to specify an install location is with a @code{prefix} at the configure stage, for instance @samp{./configure prefix=/opt} results in library files as say @file{/opt/lib/foobar-c-code.so}. When using Autoconf (@pxref{Top, , Introduction, autoconf, The GNU Autoconf Manual}), the library location is in a @code{libdir} variable. Its value is intended to be expanded by @command{make}, and can by substituted into a source file like @file{foo.scm.in} @example (define-module (foo bar)) (load-extension "XXlibdirXX/foobar-c-code" "foo_bar_init") @end example @noindent with the following in a @file{Makefile}, using @command{sed} (@pxref{Top, , Introduction, sed, SED, A Stream Editor}), @example foo.scm: foo.scm.in sed 's|XXlibdirXX|$(libdir)|' foo.scm @end example The actual pattern @code{XXlibdirXX} is arbitrary, it's only something which doesn't otherwise occur. If several modules need the value, it can be easier to create one @file{foo/config.scm} with a define of the @code{libdir} location, and use that as required. @example (define-module (foo config)) (define-public foo-config-libdir "XXlibdirXX"") @end example Such a file might have other locations too, for instance a data directory for auxiliary files, or @code{localedir} if the module has its own @code{gettext} message catalogue (@pxref{Internationalization}). When installing multiple C code objects, it can be convenient to put them in a subdirectory of @code{libdir}, thus giving for example @code{/usr/lib/foo/some-obj.so}. If the objects are only meant to be used through the module, then a subdirectory keeps them out of sight. It will be noted all of the above requires that the Scheme code to be found in @code{%load-path} (@pxref{Build Config}). Presently it's left up to the system administrator or each user to augment that path when installing Guile modules in non-default locations. But having reached the Scheme code, that code should take care of hitting any of its own private files etc. Presently there's no convention for having a Guile version number in module C code filenames or directories. This is primarily because there's no established principles for two versions of Guile to be installed under the same prefix (eg. two both under @file{/usr}). Assuming upward compatibility is maintained then this should be unnecessary, and if compatibility is not maintained then it's highly likely a package will need to be revisited anyway. The present suggestion is that modules should assume when they're installed under a particular @code{prefix} that there's a single version of Guile there, and the @code{guile-config} at build time has the necessary information about it. C code or Scheme code might adapt itself accordingly (allowing for features not available in an older version for instance). @node Foreign Values @subsection Foreign Values @deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-pointer name type dobj [len] @deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_pointer (name, type, dobj, len) Return a ``handle'' for the pointer @var{name} in the shared object referred to by @var{dobj}. The handle aliases a C value, and is declared to be of type @var{type}. Valid types are defined in the @code{(system foreign)} module. This facility works by asking the dynamic linker for the address of a symbol, then assuming that it aliases a value of a given type. Obviously, the user must be very careful to ensure that the value actually is of the declared type, or bad things will happen. Regardless whether your C compiler prepends an underscore @samp{_} to the global names in a program, you should @strong{not} include this underscore in @var{name} since it will be added automatically when necessary. @end deffn @node Dynamic FFI @subsection Dynamic FFI TBD @c Local Variables: @c TeX-master: "guile.texi" @c End: