mirror of
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git
synced 2025-04-30 20:00:19 +02:00
* module/language/tree-il/analyze.scm (analyze-lexicals): Rework to actually determine when a fixed-point procedure may be allocated as a label. * module/language/tree-il/compile-glil.scm (emit-bindings): Always emit a <glil-bind>. Otherwise it's too hard to pair with unbindings. (flatten-lambda): Consequently, here we only `bind' if there are any vars to bind. This doesn't make any difference, given that lambdas don't have trailing unbind instructions, but it does keep the GLIL output the same for thunks -- no extraneous (bind) instructions. Keeps tree-il.test happy. (flatten): Some bugfixes. Yaaay, it works!!!
617 lines
26 KiB
Scheme
617 lines
26 KiB
Scheme
;;; TREE-IL -> GLIL compiler
|
||
|
||
;; Copyright (C) 2001,2008,2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
||
|
||
;;;; This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
||
;;;; modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
||
;;;; License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
|
||
;;;; version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
||
;;;;
|
||
;;;; This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
||
;;;; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
||
;;;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
||
;;;; Lesser General Public License for more details.
|
||
;;;;
|
||
;;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
||
;;;; License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
|
||
;;;; Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
|
||
|
||
;;; Code:
|
||
|
||
(define-module (language tree-il analyze)
|
||
#:use-module (srfi srfi-1)
|
||
#:use-module (srfi srfi-9)
|
||
#:use-module (system base syntax)
|
||
#:use-module (system base message)
|
||
#:use-module (language tree-il)
|
||
#:export (analyze-lexicals
|
||
report-unused-variables))
|
||
|
||
;; Allocation is the process of assigning storage locations for lexical
|
||
;; variables. A lexical variable has a distinct "address", or storage
|
||
;; location, for each procedure in which it is referenced.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; A variable is "local", i.e., allocated on the stack, if it is
|
||
;; referenced from within the procedure that defined it. Otherwise it is
|
||
;; a "closure" variable. For example:
|
||
;;
|
||
;; (lambda (a) a) ; a will be local
|
||
;; `a' is local to the procedure.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; (lambda (a) (lambda () a))
|
||
;; `a' is local to the outer procedure, but a closure variable with
|
||
;; respect to the inner procedure.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; If a variable is ever assigned, it needs to be heap-allocated
|
||
;; ("boxed"). This is so that closures and continuations capture the
|
||
;; variable's identity, not just one of the values it may have over the
|
||
;; course of program execution. If the variable is never assigned, there
|
||
;; is no distinction between value and identity, so closing over its
|
||
;; identity (whether through closures or continuations) can make a copy
|
||
;; of its value instead.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; Local variables are stored on the stack within a procedure's call
|
||
;; frame. Their index into the stack is determined from their linear
|
||
;; postion within a procedure's binding path:
|
||
;; (let (0 1)
|
||
;; (let (2 3) ...)
|
||
;; (let (2) ...))
|
||
;; (let (2 3 4) ...))
|
||
;; etc.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; This algorithm has the problem that variables are only allocated
|
||
;; indices at the end of the binding path. If variables bound early in
|
||
;; the path are not used in later portions of the path, their indices
|
||
;; will not be recycled. This problem is particularly egregious in the
|
||
;; expansion of `or':
|
||
;;
|
||
;; (or x y z)
|
||
;; -> (let ((a x)) (if a a (let ((b y)) (if b b z))))
|
||
;;
|
||
;; As you can see, the `a' binding is only used in the ephemeral `then'
|
||
;; clause of the first `if', but its index would be reserved for the
|
||
;; whole of the `or' expansion. So we have a hack for this specific
|
||
;; case. A proper solution would be some sort of liveness analysis, and
|
||
;; not our linear allocation algorithm.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; Closure variables are captured when a closure is created, and stored
|
||
;; in a vector. Each closure variable has a unique index into that
|
||
;; vector.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; There is one more complication. Procedures bound by <fix> may, in
|
||
;; some cases, be rendered inline to their parent procedure. That is to
|
||
;; say,
|
||
;;
|
||
;; (letrec ((lp (lambda () (lp)))) (lp))
|
||
;; => (fix ((lp (lambda () (lp)))) (lp))
|
||
;; => goto FIX-BODY; LP: goto LP; FIX-BODY: goto LP;
|
||
;; ^ jump over the loop ^ the fixpoint lp ^ starting off the loop
|
||
;;
|
||
;; The upshot is that we don't have to allocate any space for the `lp'
|
||
;; closure at all, as it can be rendered inline as a loop. So there is
|
||
;; another kind of allocation, "label allocation", in which the
|
||
;; procedure is simply a label, placed at the start of the lambda body.
|
||
;; The label is the gensym under which the lambda expression is bound.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; The analyzer checks to see that the label is called with the correct
|
||
;; number of arguments. Calls to labels compile to rename + goto.
|
||
;; Lambda, the ultimate goto!
|
||
;;
|
||
;;
|
||
;; The return value of `analyze-lexicals' is a hash table, the
|
||
;; "allocation".
|
||
;;
|
||
;; The allocation maps gensyms -- recall that each lexically bound
|
||
;; variable has a unique gensym -- to storage locations ("addresses").
|
||
;; Since one gensym may have many storage locations, if it is referenced
|
||
;; in many procedures, it is a two-level map.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; The allocation also stored information on how many local variables
|
||
;; need to be allocated for each procedure, lexicals that have been
|
||
;; translated into labels, and information on what free variables to
|
||
;; capture from its lexical parent procedure.
|
||
;;
|
||
;; That is:
|
||
;;
|
||
;; sym -> {lambda -> address}
|
||
;; lambda -> (nlocs labels . free-locs)
|
||
;;
|
||
;; address ::= (local? boxed? . index)
|
||
;; labels ::= ((sym . lambda-vars) ...)
|
||
;; free-locs ::= ((sym0 . address0) (sym1 . address1) ...)
|
||
;; free variable addresses are relative to parent proc.
|
||
|
||
(define (make-hashq k v)
|
||
(let ((res (make-hash-table)))
|
||
(hashq-set! res k v)
|
||
res))
|
||
|
||
(define (analyze-lexicals x)
|
||
;; bound-vars: lambda -> (sym ...)
|
||
;; all identifiers bound within a lambda
|
||
(define bound-vars (make-hash-table))
|
||
;; free-vars: lambda -> (sym ...)
|
||
;; all identifiers referenced in a lambda, but not bound
|
||
;; NB, this includes identifiers referenced by contained lambdas
|
||
(define free-vars (make-hash-table))
|
||
;; assigned: sym -> #t
|
||
;; variables that are assigned
|
||
(define assigned (make-hash-table))
|
||
;; refcounts: sym -> count
|
||
;; allows us to detect the or-expansion in O(1) time
|
||
(define refcounts (make-hash-table))
|
||
;; labels: sym -> lambda-vars
|
||
;; for determining if fixed-point procedures can be rendered as
|
||
;; labels. lambda-vars may be an improper list.
|
||
(define labels (make-hash-table))
|
||
|
||
;; returns variables referenced in expr
|
||
(define (analyze! x proc labels-in-proc tail? tail-call-args)
|
||
(define (step y) (analyze! y proc labels-in-proc #f #f))
|
||
(define (step-tail y) (analyze! y proc labels-in-proc tail? #f))
|
||
(define (step-tail-call y args) (analyze! y proc labels-in-proc #f
|
||
(and tail? args)))
|
||
(define (recur/labels x new-proc labels)
|
||
(analyze! x new-proc (append labels labels-in-proc) #t #f))
|
||
(define (recur x new-proc) (analyze! x new-proc '() tail? #f))
|
||
(record-case x
|
||
((<application> proc args)
|
||
(apply lset-union eq? (step-tail-call proc args)
|
||
(map step args)))
|
||
|
||
((<conditional> test then else)
|
||
(lset-union eq? (step test) (step-tail then) (step-tail else)))
|
||
|
||
((<lexical-ref> name gensym)
|
||
(hashq-set! refcounts gensym (1+ (hashq-ref refcounts gensym 0)))
|
||
(if (not (and tail-call-args
|
||
(memq gensym labels-in-proc)
|
||
(let ((args (hashq-ref labels gensym)))
|
||
(and (list? args)
|
||
(= (length args) (length tail-call-args))))))
|
||
(hashq-set! labels gensym #f))
|
||
(list gensym))
|
||
|
||
((<lexical-set> name gensym exp)
|
||
(hashq-set! assigned gensym #t)
|
||
(hashq-set! labels gensym #f)
|
||
(lset-adjoin eq? (step exp) gensym))
|
||
|
||
((<module-set> mod name public? exp)
|
||
(step exp))
|
||
|
||
((<toplevel-set> name exp)
|
||
(step exp))
|
||
|
||
((<toplevel-define> name exp)
|
||
(step exp))
|
||
|
||
((<sequence> exps)
|
||
(let lp ((exps exps) (ret '()))
|
||
(cond ((null? exps) '())
|
||
((null? (cdr exps))
|
||
(lset-union eq? ret (step-tail (car exps))))
|
||
(else
|
||
(lp (cdr exps) (lset-union eq? ret (step (car exps))))))))
|
||
|
||
((<lambda> vars meta body)
|
||
(let ((locally-bound (let rev* ((vars vars) (out '()))
|
||
(cond ((null? vars) out)
|
||
((pair? vars) (rev* (cdr vars)
|
||
(cons (car vars) out)))
|
||
(else (cons vars out))))))
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars x locally-bound)
|
||
(let* ((referenced (recur body x))
|
||
(free (lset-difference eq? referenced locally-bound))
|
||
(all-bound (reverse! (hashq-ref bound-vars x))))
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars x all-bound)
|
||
(hashq-set! free-vars x free)
|
||
free)))
|
||
|
||
((<let> vars vals body)
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars proc
|
||
(append (reverse vars) (hashq-ref bound-vars proc)))
|
||
(lset-difference eq?
|
||
(apply lset-union eq? (step-tail body) (map step vals))
|
||
vars))
|
||
|
||
((<letrec> vars vals body)
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars proc
|
||
(append (reverse vars) (hashq-ref bound-vars proc)))
|
||
(for-each (lambda (sym) (hashq-set! assigned sym #t)) vars)
|
||
(lset-difference eq?
|
||
(apply lset-union eq? (step-tail body) (map step vals))
|
||
vars))
|
||
|
||
((<fix> vars vals body)
|
||
;; Try to allocate these procedures as labels.
|
||
(for-each (lambda (sym val) (hashq-set! labels sym (lambda-vars val)))
|
||
vars vals)
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars proc
|
||
(append (reverse vars) (hashq-ref bound-vars proc)))
|
||
;; Step into subexpressions.
|
||
(let* ((var-refs
|
||
(map
|
||
;; Since we're trying to label-allocate the lambda,
|
||
;; pretend it's not a closure, and just recurse into its
|
||
;; body directly. (Otherwise, recursing on a closure
|
||
;; that references one of the fix's bound vars would
|
||
;; prevent label allocation.)
|
||
(lambda (x)
|
||
(record-case x
|
||
((<lambda> (lvars vars) body)
|
||
(let ((locally-bound
|
||
(let rev* ((lvars lvars) (out '()))
|
||
(cond ((null? lvars) out)
|
||
((pair? lvars) (rev* (cdr lvars)
|
||
(cons (car lvars) out)))
|
||
(else (cons lvars out))))))
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars x locally-bound)
|
||
;; recur/labels, the difference from the closure case
|
||
(let* ((referenced (recur/labels body x vars))
|
||
(free (lset-difference eq? referenced locally-bound))
|
||
(all-bound (reverse! (hashq-ref bound-vars x))))
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars x all-bound)
|
||
(hashq-set! free-vars x free)
|
||
free)))))
|
||
vals))
|
||
(vars-with-refs (map cons vars var-refs))
|
||
(body-refs (recur/labels body proc vars)))
|
||
(define (delabel-dependents! sym)
|
||
(let ((refs (assq-ref vars-with-refs sym)))
|
||
(if refs
|
||
(for-each (lambda (sym)
|
||
(if (hashq-ref labels sym)
|
||
(begin
|
||
(hashq-set! labels sym #f)
|
||
(delabel-dependents! sym))))
|
||
refs))))
|
||
;; Stepping into the lambdas and the body might have made some
|
||
;; procedures not label-allocatable -- which might have
|
||
;; knock-on effects. For example:
|
||
;; (fix ((a (lambda () (b)))
|
||
;; (b (lambda () a)))
|
||
;; (a))
|
||
;; As far as `a' is concerned, both `a' and `b' are
|
||
;; label-allocatable. But `b' references `a' not in a proc-tail
|
||
;; position, which makes `a' not label-allocatable. The
|
||
;; knock-on effect is that, when back-propagating this
|
||
;; information to `a', `b' will also become not
|
||
;; label-allocatable, as it is referenced within `a', which is
|
||
;; allocated as a closure. This is a transitive relationship.
|
||
(for-each (lambda (sym)
|
||
(if (not (hashq-ref labels sym))
|
||
(delabel-dependents! sym)))
|
||
vars)
|
||
;; Now lift bound variables with label-allocated lambdas to the
|
||
;; parent procedure.
|
||
(for-each
|
||
(lambda (sym val)
|
||
(if (hashq-ref labels sym)
|
||
;; Remove traces of the label-bound lambda. The free
|
||
;; vars will propagate up via the return val.
|
||
(begin
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars proc
|
||
(append (hashq-ref bound-vars val)
|
||
(hashq-ref bound-vars proc)))
|
||
(hashq-remove! bound-vars val)
|
||
(hashq-remove! free-vars val))))
|
||
vars vals)
|
||
(lset-difference eq?
|
||
(apply lset-union eq? body-refs var-refs)
|
||
vars)))
|
||
|
||
((<let-values> vars exp body)
|
||
(let ((bound (let lp ((out (hashq-ref bound-vars proc)) (in vars))
|
||
(if (pair? in)
|
||
(lp (cons (car in) out) (cdr in))
|
||
(if (null? in) out (cons in out))))))
|
||
(hashq-set! bound-vars proc bound)
|
||
(lset-difference eq?
|
||
(lset-union eq? (step exp) (step-tail body))
|
||
bound)))
|
||
|
||
(else '())))
|
||
|
||
;; allocation: sym -> {lambda -> address}
|
||
;; lambda -> (nlocs labels . free-locs)
|
||
(define allocation (make-hash-table))
|
||
|
||
(define (allocate! x proc n)
|
||
(define (recur y) (allocate! y proc n))
|
||
(record-case x
|
||
((<application> proc args)
|
||
(apply max (recur proc) (map recur args)))
|
||
|
||
((<conditional> test then else)
|
||
(max (recur test) (recur then) (recur else)))
|
||
|
||
((<lexical-set> name gensym exp)
|
||
(recur exp))
|
||
|
||
((<module-set> mod name public? exp)
|
||
(recur exp))
|
||
|
||
((<toplevel-set> name exp)
|
||
(recur exp))
|
||
|
||
((<toplevel-define> name exp)
|
||
(recur exp))
|
||
|
||
((<sequence> exps)
|
||
(apply max (map recur exps)))
|
||
|
||
((<lambda> vars meta body)
|
||
;; allocate closure vars in order
|
||
(let lp ((c (hashq-ref free-vars x)) (n 0))
|
||
(if (pair? c)
|
||
(begin
|
||
(hashq-set! (hashq-ref allocation (car c))
|
||
x
|
||
`(#f ,(hashq-ref assigned (car c)) . ,n))
|
||
(lp (cdr c) (1+ n)))))
|
||
|
||
(let ((nlocs
|
||
(let lp ((vars vars) (n 0))
|
||
(if (not (null? vars))
|
||
;; allocate args
|
||
(let ((v (if (pair? vars) (car vars) vars)))
|
||
(hashq-set! allocation v
|
||
(make-hashq
|
||
x `(#t ,(hashq-ref assigned v) . ,n)))
|
||
(lp (if (pair? vars) (cdr vars) '()) (1+ n)))
|
||
;; allocate body, return number of additional locals
|
||
(- (allocate! body x n) n))))
|
||
(free-addresses
|
||
(map (lambda (v)
|
||
(hashq-ref (hashq-ref allocation v) proc))
|
||
(hashq-ref free-vars x)))
|
||
(labels (filter cdr
|
||
(map (lambda (sym)
|
||
(cons sym (hashq-ref labels sym)))
|
||
(hashq-ref bound-vars x)))))
|
||
;; set procedure allocations
|
||
(hashq-set! allocation x (cons* nlocs labels free-addresses)))
|
||
n)
|
||
|
||
((<let> vars vals body)
|
||
(let ((nmax (apply max (map recur vals))))
|
||
(cond
|
||
;; the `or' hack
|
||
((and (conditional? body)
|
||
(= (length vars) 1)
|
||
(let ((v (car vars)))
|
||
(and (not (hashq-ref assigned v))
|
||
(= (hashq-ref refcounts v 0) 2)
|
||
(lexical-ref? (conditional-test body))
|
||
(eq? (lexical-ref-gensym (conditional-test body)) v)
|
||
(lexical-ref? (conditional-then body))
|
||
(eq? (lexical-ref-gensym (conditional-then body)) v))))
|
||
(hashq-set! allocation (car vars)
|
||
(make-hashq proc `(#t #f . ,n)))
|
||
;; the 1+ for this var
|
||
(max nmax (1+ n) (allocate! (conditional-else body) proc n)))
|
||
(else
|
||
(let lp ((vars vars) (n n))
|
||
(if (null? vars)
|
||
(max nmax (allocate! body proc n))
|
||
(let ((v (car vars)))
|
||
(hashq-set!
|
||
allocation v
|
||
(make-hashq proc
|
||
`(#t ,(hashq-ref assigned v) . ,n)))
|
||
(lp (cdr vars) (1+ n)))))))))
|
||
|
||
((<letrec> vars vals body)
|
||
(let lp ((vars vars) (n n))
|
||
(if (null? vars)
|
||
(let ((nmax (apply max
|
||
(map (lambda (x)
|
||
(allocate! x proc n))
|
||
vals))))
|
||
(max nmax (allocate! body proc n)))
|
||
(let ((v (car vars)))
|
||
(hashq-set!
|
||
allocation v
|
||
(make-hashq proc
|
||
`(#t ,(hashq-ref assigned v) . ,n)))
|
||
(lp (cdr vars) (1+ n))))))
|
||
|
||
((<fix> vars vals body)
|
||
(let lp ((in vars) (n n))
|
||
(if (null? in)
|
||
(let lp ((vars vars) (vals vals) (nmax n))
|
||
(cond
|
||
((null? vars)
|
||
(max nmax (allocate! body proc n)))
|
||
((hashq-ref labels (car vars))
|
||
;; allocate label bindings & body inline to proc
|
||
(lp (cdr vars)
|
||
(cdr vals)
|
||
(record-case (car vals)
|
||
((<lambda> vars body)
|
||
(let lp ((vars vars) (n n))
|
||
(if (not (null? vars))
|
||
;; allocate bindings
|
||
(let ((v (if (pair? vars) (car vars) vars)))
|
||
(hashq-set!
|
||
allocation v
|
||
(make-hashq
|
||
proc `(#t ,(hashq-ref assigned v) . ,n)))
|
||
(lp (if (pair? vars) (cdr vars) '()) (1+ n)))
|
||
;; allocate body
|
||
(max nmax (allocate! body proc n))))))))
|
||
(else
|
||
;; allocate closure
|
||
(lp (cdr vars)
|
||
(cdr vals)
|
||
(max nmax (allocate! (car vals) proc n))))))
|
||
|
||
(let ((v (car in)))
|
||
(cond
|
||
((hashq-ref assigned v)
|
||
(error "fixpoint procedures may not be assigned" x))
|
||
((hashq-ref labels v)
|
||
;; no binding, it's a label
|
||
(lp (cdr in) n))
|
||
(else
|
||
;; allocate closure binding
|
||
(hashq-set! allocation v (make-hashq proc `(#t #f . ,n)))
|
||
(lp (cdr in) (1+ n))))))))
|
||
|
||
((<let-values> vars exp body)
|
||
(let ((nmax (recur exp)))
|
||
(let lp ((vars vars) (n n))
|
||
(cond
|
||
((null? vars)
|
||
(max nmax (allocate! body proc n)))
|
||
((not (pair? vars))
|
||
(hashq-set! allocation vars
|
||
(make-hashq proc
|
||
`(#t ,(hashq-ref assigned vars) . ,n)))
|
||
;; the 1+ for this var
|
||
(max nmax (allocate! body proc (1+ n))))
|
||
(else
|
||
(let ((v (car vars)))
|
||
(hashq-set!
|
||
allocation v
|
||
(make-hashq proc
|
||
`(#t ,(hashq-ref assigned v) . ,n)))
|
||
(lp (cdr vars) (1+ n))))))))
|
||
|
||
(else n)))
|
||
|
||
(analyze! x #f '() #t #f)
|
||
(allocate! x #f 0)
|
||
|
||
allocation)
|
||
|
||
|
||
;;;
|
||
;;; Unused variable analysis.
|
||
;;;
|
||
|
||
;; <binding-info> records are used during tree traversals in
|
||
;; `report-unused-variables'. They contain a list of the local vars
|
||
;; currently in scope, a list of locals vars that have been referenced, and a
|
||
;; "location stack" (the stack of `tree-il-src' values for each parent tree).
|
||
(define-record-type <binding-info>
|
||
(make-binding-info vars refs locs)
|
||
binding-info?
|
||
(vars binding-info-vars) ;; ((GENSYM NAME LOCATION) ...)
|
||
(refs binding-info-refs) ;; (GENSYM ...)
|
||
(locs binding-info-locs)) ;; (LOCATION ...)
|
||
|
||
(define (report-unused-variables tree)
|
||
"Report about unused variables in TREE. Return TREE."
|
||
|
||
(define (dotless-list lst)
|
||
;; If LST is a dotted list, return a proper list equal to LST except that
|
||
;; the very last element is a pair; otherwise return LST.
|
||
(let loop ((lst lst)
|
||
(result '()))
|
||
(cond ((null? lst)
|
||
(reverse result))
|
||
((pair? lst)
|
||
(loop (cdr lst) (cons (car lst) result)))
|
||
(else
|
||
(loop '() (cons lst result))))))
|
||
|
||
(tree-il-fold (lambda (x info)
|
||
;; X is a leaf: extend INFO's refs accordingly.
|
||
(let ((refs (binding-info-refs info))
|
||
(vars (binding-info-vars info))
|
||
(locs (binding-info-locs info)))
|
||
(record-case x
|
||
((<lexical-ref> gensym)
|
||
(make-binding-info vars (cons gensym refs) locs))
|
||
(else info))))
|
||
|
||
(lambda (x info)
|
||
;; Going down into X: extend INFO's variable list
|
||
;; accordingly.
|
||
(let ((refs (binding-info-refs info))
|
||
(vars (binding-info-vars info))
|
||
(locs (binding-info-locs info))
|
||
(src (tree-il-src x)))
|
||
(define (extend inner-vars inner-names)
|
||
(append (map (lambda (var name)
|
||
(list var name src))
|
||
inner-vars
|
||
inner-names)
|
||
vars))
|
||
(record-case x
|
||
((<lexical-set> gensym)
|
||
(make-binding-info vars (cons gensym refs)
|
||
(cons src locs)))
|
||
((<lambda> vars names)
|
||
(let ((vars (dotless-list vars))
|
||
(names (dotless-list names)))
|
||
(make-binding-info (extend vars names) refs
|
||
(cons src locs))))
|
||
((<let> vars names)
|
||
(make-binding-info (extend vars names) refs
|
||
(cons src locs)))
|
||
((<letrec> vars names)
|
||
(make-binding-info (extend vars names) refs
|
||
(cons src locs)))
|
||
((<fix> vars names)
|
||
(make-binding-info (extend vars names) refs
|
||
(cons src locs)))
|
||
((<let-values> vars names)
|
||
(make-binding-info (extend vars names) refs
|
||
(cons src locs)))
|
||
(else info))))
|
||
|
||
(lambda (x info)
|
||
;; Leaving X's scope: shrink INFO's variable list
|
||
;; accordingly and reported unused nested variables.
|
||
(let ((refs (binding-info-refs info))
|
||
(vars (binding-info-vars info))
|
||
(locs (binding-info-locs info)))
|
||
(define (shrink inner-vars refs)
|
||
(for-each (lambda (var)
|
||
(let ((gensym (car var)))
|
||
;; Don't report lambda parameters as
|
||
;; unused.
|
||
(if (and (not (memq gensym refs))
|
||
(not (and (lambda? x)
|
||
(memq gensym
|
||
inner-vars))))
|
||
(let ((name (cadr var))
|
||
;; We can get approximate
|
||
;; source location by going up
|
||
;; the LOCS location stack.
|
||
(loc (or (caddr var)
|
||
(find pair? locs))))
|
||
(warning 'unused-variable loc name)))))
|
||
(filter (lambda (var)
|
||
(memq (car var) inner-vars))
|
||
vars))
|
||
(fold alist-delete vars inner-vars))
|
||
|
||
;; For simplicity, we leave REFS untouched, i.e., with
|
||
;; names of variables that are now going out of scope.
|
||
;; It doesn't hurt as these are unique names, it just
|
||
;; makes REFS unnecessarily fat.
|
||
(record-case x
|
||
((<lambda> vars)
|
||
(let ((vars (dotless-list vars)))
|
||
(make-binding-info (shrink vars refs) refs
|
||
(cdr locs))))
|
||
((<let> vars)
|
||
(make-binding-info (shrink vars refs) refs
|
||
(cdr locs)))
|
||
((<letrec> vars)
|
||
(make-binding-info (shrink vars refs) refs
|
||
(cdr locs)))
|
||
((<fix> vars)
|
||
(make-binding-info (shrink vars refs) refs
|
||
(cdr locs)))
|
||
((<let-values> vars)
|
||
(make-binding-info (shrink vars refs) refs
|
||
(cdr locs)))
|
||
(else info))))
|
||
(make-binding-info '() '() '())
|
||
tree)
|
||
tree)
|