guile/doc/ref/api-control.texi

@c -*-texinfo-*-
@c This is part of the GNU Guile Reference Manual.
@c Copyright (C)  1996, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2009, 2010,
@c   2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@c See the file guile.texi for copying conditions.

@node Control Mechanisms
@section Controlling the Flow of Program Execution

See @ref{Control Flow} for a discussion of how the more general control
flow of Scheme affects C code.

@menu
* begin::                       Sequencing and splicing.
* Conditionals::                If, when, unless, case, and cond.
* and or::                      Conditional evaluation of a sequence.
* while do::                    Iteration mechanisms.
* Prompts::                     Composable, delimited continuations.
* Continuations::               Non-composable continuations.
* Multiple Values::             Returning and accepting multiple values.
* Exceptions::                  Throwing and catching exceptions.
* Error Reporting::             Procedures for signaling errors.
* Dynamic Wind::                Dealing with non-local entrance/exit.
* Fluids and Dynamic States::   Dynamic scope building blocks.
* Parameters::                  A dynamic scope facility.
* Handling Errors::             How to handle errors in C code.
* Continuation Barriers::       Protection from non-local control flow.
@end menu

@node begin
@subsection Sequencing and Splicing

@cindex begin
@cindex sequencing
@cindex expression sequencing

As an expression, the @code{begin} syntax is used to evaluate a sequence
of sub-expressions in order.  Consider the conditional expression below:

@lisp
(if (> x 0)
    (begin (display "greater") (newline)))
@end lisp

If the test is true, we want to display ``greater'' to the current
output port, then display a newline.  We use @code{begin} to form a
compound expression out of this sequence of sub-expressions.

@deffn syntax begin expr @dots{}
The expression(s) are evaluated in left-to-right order and the value of
the last expression is returned as the value of the
@code{begin}-expression.  This expression type is used when the
expressions before the last one are evaluated for their side effects.
@end deffn

@cindex splicing
@cindex definition splicing

The @code{begin} syntax has another role in definition context
(@pxref{Internal Definitions}).  A @code{begin} form in a definition
context @dfn{splices} its subforms into its place.  For example,
consider the following procedure:

@lisp
(define (make-seal)
  (define-sealant seal open)
  (values seal open))
@end lisp

Let us assume the existence of a @code{define-sealant} macro that
expands out to some definitions wrapped in a @code{begin}, like so:

@lisp
(define (make-seal)
  (begin
    (define seal-tag
      (list 'seal))
    (define (seal x)
      (cons seal-tag x))
    (define (sealed? x)
      (and (pair? x) (eq? (car x) seal-tag)))
    (define (open x)
      (if (sealed? x)
          (cdr x)
          (error "Expected a sealed value:" x))))
  (values seal open))
@end lisp

Here, because the @code{begin} is in definition context, its subforms
are @dfn{spliced} into the place of the @code{begin}.  This allows the
definitions created by the macro to be visible to the following
expression, the @code{values} form.

It is a fine point, but splicing and sequencing are different.  It can
make sense to splice zero forms, because it can make sense to have zero
internal definitions before the expressions in a procedure or lexical
binding form.  However it does not make sense to have a sequence of zero
expressions, because in that case it would not be clear what the value
of the sequence would be, because in a sequence of zero expressions,
there can be no last value.  Sequencing zero expressions is an error.

It would be more elegant in some ways to eliminate splicing from the
Scheme language, and without macros (@pxref{Macros}), that would be a
good idea.  But it is useful to be able to write macros that expand out
to multiple definitions, as in @code{define-sealant} above, so Scheme
abuses the @code{begin} form for these two tasks.

@node Conditionals
@subsection Simple Conditional Evaluation

@cindex conditional evaluation
@cindex if
@cindex when
@cindex unless
@cindex case
@cindex cond

Guile provides three syntactic constructs for conditional evaluation.
@code{if} is the normal if-then-else expression (with an optional else
branch), @code{cond} is a conditional expression with multiple branches
and @code{case} branches if an expression has one of a set of constant
values.

@deffn syntax if test consequent [alternate]
All arguments may be arbitrary expressions.  First, @var{test} is
evaluated.  If it returns a true value, the expression @var{consequent}
is evaluated and @var{alternate} is ignored.  If @var{test} evaluates to
@code{#f}, @var{alternate} is evaluated instead.  The values of the
evaluated branch (@var{consequent} or @var{alternate}) are returned as
the values of the @code{if} expression.

When @var{alternate} is omitted and the @var{test} evaluates to
@code{#f}, the value of the expression is not specified.
@end deffn

When you go to write an @code{if} without an alternate (a @dfn{one-armed
@code{if}}), part of what you are expressing is that you don't care
about the return value (or values) of the expression.  As such, you are
more interested in the @emph{effect} of evaluating the consequent
expression.  (By convention, we use the word @dfn{statement} to refer to
an expression that is evaluated for effect, not for value).

In such a case, it is considered more clear to express these intentions
with these special forms, @code{when} and @code{unless}.  As an added
bonus, these forms accept multiple statements to evaluate, which are
implicitly wrapped in a @code{begin}.

@deffn {Scheme Syntax} when test statement1 statement2 ...
@deffnx {Scheme Syntax} unless test statement1 statement2 ...
The actual definitions of these forms are in many ways their most clear
documentation:

@example
(define-syntax-rule (when test stmt stmt* ...)
  (if test (begin stmt stmt* ...)))

(define-syntax-rule (unless condition stmt stmt* ...)
  (if (not test) (begin stmt stmt* ...)))
@end example

That is to say, @code{when} evaluates its consequent statements in order
if @var{test} is true.  @code{unless} is the opposite: it evaluates the
statements if @var{test} is false.
@end deffn

@deffn syntax cond clause1 clause2 @dots{}
Each @code{cond}-clause must look like this:

@lisp
(@var{test} @var{expression} @dots{})
@end lisp

where @var{test} and @var{expression} are arbitrary expressions, or like
this

@lisp
(@var{test} => @var{expression})
@end lisp

where @var{expression} must evaluate to a procedure.

The @var{test}s of the clauses are evaluated in order and as soon as one
of them evaluates to a true value, the corresponding @var{expression}s
are evaluated in order and the last value is returned as the value of
the @code{cond}-expression.  For the @code{=>} clause type,
@var{expression} is evaluated and the resulting procedure is applied to
the value of @var{test}.  The result of this procedure application is
then the result of the @code{cond}-expression.

@cindex SRFI-61
@cindex general cond clause
@cindex multiple values and cond
One additional @code{cond}-clause is available as an extension to
standard Scheme:

@lisp
(@var{test} @var{guard} => @var{expression})
@end lisp

where @var{guard} and @var{expression} must evaluate to procedures.
For this clause type, @var{test} may return multiple values, and
@code{cond} ignores its boolean state; instead, @code{cond} evaluates
@var{guard} and applies the resulting procedure to the value(s) of
@var{test}, as if @var{guard} were the @var{consumer} argument of
@code{call-with-values}.  If the result of that procedure call is a
true value, it evaluates @var{expression} and applies the resulting
procedure to the value(s) of @var{test}, in the same manner as the
@var{guard} was called.

The @var{test} of the last @var{clause} may be the symbol @code{else}.
Then, if none of the preceding @var{test}s is true, the
@var{expression}s following the @code{else} are evaluated to produce the
result of the @code{cond}-expression.
@end deffn

@deffn syntax case key clause1 clause2 @dots{}
@var{key} may be any expression, and the @var{clause}s must have the form

@lisp
((@var{datum1} @dots{}) @var{expr1} @var{expr2} @dots{})
@end lisp

or

@lisp
((@var{datum1} @dots{}) => @var{expression})
@end lisp

and the last @var{clause} may have the form

@lisp
(else @var{expr1} @var{expr2} @dots{})
@end lisp

or

@lisp
(else => @var{expression})
@end lisp

All @var{datum}s must be distinct.  First, @var{key} is evaluated.  The
result of this evaluation is compared against all @var{datum} values using
@code{eqv?}.  When this comparison succeeds, the expression(s) following
the @var{datum} are evaluated from left to right, returning the value of
the last expression as the result of the @code{case} expression.

If the @var{key} matches no @var{datum} and there is an
@code{else}-clause, the expressions following the @code{else} are
evaluated.  If there is no such clause, the result of the expression is
unspecified.

For the @code{=>} clause types, @var{expression} is evaluated and the
resulting procedure is applied to the value of @var{key}.  The result of
this procedure application is then the result of the
@code{case}-expression.
@end deffn


@node and or
@subsection Conditional Evaluation of a Sequence of Expressions

@code{and} and @code{or} evaluate all their arguments in order, similar
to @code{begin}, but evaluation stops as soon as one of the expressions
evaluates to false or true, respectively.

@deffn syntax and expr @dots{}
Evaluate the @var{expr}s from left to right and stop evaluation as soon
as one expression evaluates to @code{#f}; the remaining expressions are
not evaluated.  The value of the last evaluated expression is returned.
If no expression evaluates to @code{#f}, the value of the last
expression is returned.

If used without expressions, @code{#t} is returned.
@end deffn

@deffn syntax or expr @dots{}
Evaluate the @var{expr}s from left to right and stop evaluation as soon
as one expression evaluates to a true value (that is, a value different
from @code{#f}); the remaining expressions are not evaluated.  The value
of the last evaluated expression is returned.  If all expressions
evaluate to @code{#f}, @code{#f} is returned.

If used without expressions, @code{#f} is returned.
@end deffn


@node while do
@subsection Iteration mechanisms

@cindex iteration
@cindex looping
@cindex named let

Scheme has only few iteration mechanisms, mainly because iteration in
Scheme programs is normally expressed using recursion.  Nevertheless,
R5RS defines a construct for programming loops, calling @code{do}.  In
addition, Guile has an explicit looping syntax called @code{while}.

@deffn syntax do ((variable init [step]) @dots{}) (test expr @dots{}) body @dots{}
Bind @var{variable}s and evaluate @var{body} until @var{test} is true.
The return value is the last @var{expr} after @var{test}, if given.  A
simple example will illustrate the basic form,

@example
(do ((i 1 (1+ i)))
    ((> i 4))
  (display i))
@print{} 1234
@end example

@noindent
Or with two variables and a final return value,

@example
(do ((i 1 (1+ i))
     (p 3 (* 3 p)))
    ((> i 4)
     p)
  (format #t "3**~s is ~s\n" i p))
@print{}
3**1 is 3
3**2 is 9
3**3 is 27
3**4 is 81
@result{}
789
@end example

The @var{variable} bindings are established like a @code{let}, in that
the expressions are all evaluated and then all bindings made.  When
iterating, the optional @var{step} expressions are evaluated with the
previous bindings in scope, then new bindings all made.

The @var{test} expression is a termination condition.  Looping stops
when the @var{test} is true.  It's evaluated before running the
@var{body} each time, so if it's true the first time then @var{body}
is not run at all.

The optional @var{expr}s after the @var{test} are evaluated at the end
of looping, with the final @var{variable} bindings available.  The
last @var{expr} gives the return value, or if there are no @var{expr}s
the return value is unspecified.

Each iteration establishes bindings to fresh locations for the
@var{variable}s, like a new @code{let} for each iteration.  This is
done for @var{variable}s without @var{step} expressions too.  The
following illustrates this, showing how a new @code{i} is captured by
the @code{lambda} in each iteration (@pxref{About Closure,, The
Concept of Closure}).

@example
(define lst '())
(do ((i 1 (1+ i)))
    ((> i 4))
  (set! lst (cons (lambda () i) lst)))
(map (lambda (proc) (proc)) lst)
@result{}
(4 3 2 1)
@end example
@end deffn

@deffn syntax while cond body @dots{}
Run a loop executing the @var{body} forms while @var{cond} is true.
@var{cond} is tested at the start of each iteration, so if it's
@code{#f} the first time then @var{body} is not executed at all.

Within @code{while}, two extra bindings are provided, they can be used
from both @var{cond} and @var{body}.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} break break-arg @dots{}
Break out of the @code{while} form.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} continue
Abandon the current iteration, go back to the start and test
@var{cond} again, etc.
@end deffn

If the loop terminates normally, by the @var{cond} evaluating to
@code{#f}, then the @code{while} expression as a whole evaluates to
@code{#f}.  If it terminates by a call to @code{break} with some number
of arguments, those arguments are returned from the @code{while}
expression, as multiple values.  Otherwise if it terminates by a call to
@code{break} with no arguments, then return value is @code{#t}.

@example
(while #f (error "not reached")) @result{} #f
(while #t (break)) @result{} #t
(while #t (break 1 2 3)) @result{} 1 2 3
@end example

Each @code{while} form gets its own @code{break} and @code{continue}
procedures, operating on that @code{while}.  This means when loops are
nested the outer @code{break} can be used to escape all the way out.
For example,

@example
(while (test1)
  (let ((outer-break break))
    (while (test2)
      (if (something)
        (outer-break #f))
      ...)))
@end example

Note that each @code{break} and @code{continue} procedure can only be
used within the dynamic extent of its @code{while}.  Outside the
@code{while} their behaviour is unspecified.
@end deffn

@cindex named let
Another very common way of expressing iteration in Scheme programs is
the use of the so-called @dfn{named let}.

Named let is a variant of @code{let} which creates a procedure and calls
it in one step.  Because of the newly created procedure, named let is
more powerful than @code{do}--it can be used for iteration, but also
for arbitrary recursion.

@deffn syntax let variable bindings body
For the definition of @var{bindings} see the documentation about
@code{let} (@pxref{Local Bindings}).

Named @code{let} works as follows:

@itemize @bullet
@item
A new procedure which accepts as many arguments as are in @var{bindings}
is created and bound locally (using @code{let}) to @var{variable}.  The
new procedure's formal argument names are the name of the
@var{variables}.

@item
The @var{body} expressions are inserted into the newly created procedure.

@item
The procedure is called with the @var{init} expressions as the formal
arguments.
@end itemize

The next example implements a loop which iterates (by recursion) 1000
times.

@lisp
(let lp ((x 1000))
  (if (positive? x)
      (lp (- x 1))
      x))
@result{}
0
@end lisp
@end deffn


@node Prompts
@subsection Prompts
@cindex prompts
@cindex delimited continuations
@cindex composable continuations
@cindex non-local exit

Prompts are control-flow barriers between different parts of a program. In the
same way that a user sees a shell prompt (e.g., the Bash prompt) as a barrier
between the operating system and her programs, Scheme prompts allow the Scheme
programmer to treat parts of programs as if they were running in different
operating systems.

We use this roundabout explanation because, unless you're a functional
programming junkie, you probably haven't heard the term, ``delimited, composable
continuation''. That's OK; it's a relatively recent topic, but a very useful
one to know about.

@menu
* Prompt Primitives::           Call-with-prompt and abort-to-prompt.
* Shift and Reset::             The zoo of delimited control operators.
@end menu

@node Prompt Primitives
@subsubsection Prompt Primitives

Guile's primitive delimited control operators are
@code{call-with-prompt} and @code{abort-to-prompt}.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} call-with-prompt tag thunk handler
Set up a prompt, and call @var{thunk} within that prompt.

During the dynamic extent of the call to @var{thunk}, a prompt named @var{tag}
will be present in the dynamic context, such that if a user calls
@code{abort-to-prompt} (see below) with that tag, control rewinds back to the
prompt, and the @var{handler} is run.

@var{handler} must be a procedure. The first argument to @var{handler} will be
the state of the computation begun when @var{thunk} was called, and ending with
the call to @code{abort-to-prompt}. The remaining arguments to @var{handler} are
those passed to @code{abort-to-prompt}.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} make-prompt-tag [stem]
Make a new prompt tag.  A prompt tag is simply a unique object.
Currently, a prompt tag is a fresh pair.  This may change in some future
Guile version.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} default-prompt-tag
Return the default prompt tag.  Having a distinguished default prompt
tag allows some useful prompt and abort idioms, discussed in the next
section.  Note that @code{default-prompt-tag} is actually a parameter,
and so may be dynamically rebound using @code{parameterize}.
@xref{Parameters}.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} abort-to-prompt tag val1 val2 @dots{}
Unwind the dynamic and control context to the nearest prompt named @var{tag},
also passing the given values.
@end deffn

C programmers may recognize @code{call-with-prompt} and @code{abort-to-prompt}
as a fancy kind of @code{setjmp} and @code{longjmp}, respectively. Prompts are
indeed quite useful as non-local escape mechanisms. Guile's @code{catch} and
@code{throw} are implemented in terms of prompts. Prompts are more convenient
than @code{longjmp}, in that one has the opportunity to pass multiple values to
the jump target.

Also unlike @code{longjmp}, the prompt handler is given the full state of the
process that was aborted, as the first argument to the prompt's handler. That
state is the @dfn{continuation} of the computation wrapped by the prompt. It is
a @dfn{delimited continuation}, because it is not the whole continuation of the
program; rather, just the computation initiated by the call to
@code{call-with-prompt}.

The continuation is a procedure, and may be reinstated simply by invoking it,
with any number of values. Here's where things get interesting, and complicated
as well. Besides being described as delimited, continuations reified by prompts
are also @dfn{composable}, because invoking a prompt-saved continuation composes
that continuation with the current one.

Imagine you have saved a continuation via call-with-prompt:

@example
(define cont
  (call-with-prompt
   ;; tag
   'foo
   ;; thunk
   (lambda ()
     (+ 34 (abort-to-prompt 'foo)))
   ;; handler
   (lambda (k) k)))
@end example

The resulting continuation is the addition of 34. It's as if you had written:

@example
(define cont
  (lambda (x)
    (+ 34 x)))
@end example

So, if we call @code{cont} with one numeric value, we get that number,
incremented by 34:

@example
(cont 8)
@result{} 42
(* 2 (cont 8))
@result{} 84
@end example

The last example illustrates what we mean when we say, "composes with the
current continuation". We mean that there is a current continuation -- some
remaining things to compute, like @code{(lambda (x) (* x 2))} -- and that
calling the saved continuation doesn't wipe out the current continuation, it
composes the saved continuation with the current one.

We're belaboring the point here because traditional Scheme continuations, as
discussed in the next section, aren't composable, and are actually less
expressive than continuations captured by prompts. But there's a place for them
both.

Before moving on, we should mention that if the handler of a prompt is a
@code{lambda} expression, and the first argument isn't referenced, an abort to
that prompt will not cause a continuation to be reified.  This can be an
important efficiency consideration to keep in mind.

@cindex continuation, escape
One example where this optimization matters is @dfn{escape
continuations}.  Escape continuations are delimited continuations whose
only use is to make a non-local exit---i.e., to escape from the current
continuation.  A common use of escape continuations is when throwing an
exception (@pxref{Exceptions}).

The constructs below are syntactic sugar atop prompts to simplify the
use of escape continuations.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} call-with-escape-continuation proc
@deffnx {Scheme Procedure} call/ec proc
Call @var{proc} with an escape continuation.

In the example below, the @var{return} continuation is used to escape
the continuation of the call to @code{fold}.

@lisp
(use-modules (ice-9 control)
             (srfi srfi-1))

(define (prefix x lst)
  ;; Return all the elements before the first occurrence
  ;; of X in LST.
  (call/ec
    (lambda (return)
      (fold (lambda (element prefix)
              (if (equal? element x)
                  (return (reverse prefix))  ; escape `fold'
                  (cons element prefix)))
            '()
            lst))))

(prefix 'a '(0 1 2 a 3 4 5))
@result{} (0 1 2)
@end lisp
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Syntax} let-escape-continuation k body @dots{}
@deffnx {Scheme Syntax} let/ec k body @dots{}
Bind @var{k} within @var{body} to an escape continuation.

This is equivalent to
@code{(call/ec (lambda (@var{k}) @var{body} @dots{}))}.
@end deffn

Additionally there is another helper primitive exported by @code{(ice-9
control)}, so load up that module for @code{suspendable-continuation?}:

@example
(use-modules (ice-9 control))
@end example

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} suspendable-continuation? tag
Return @code{#t} if a call to @code{abort-to-prompt} with the prompt tag
@var{tag} would produce a delimited continuation that could be resumed
later.

Almost all continuations have this property.  The exception is where
some code between the @code{call-with-prompt} and the
@code{abort-to-prompt} recursed through C for some reason, the
@code{abort-to-prompt} will succeed but any attempt to resume the
continuation (by calling it) would fail.  This is because composing a
saved continuation with the current continuation involves relocating the
stack frames that were saved from the old stack onto a (possibly) new
position on the new stack, and Guile can only do this for stack frames
that it created for Scheme code, not stack frames created by the C
compiler.  It's a bit gnarly but if you stick with Scheme, you won't
have any problem.

If no prompt is found with the given tag, this procedure just returns
@code{#f}.
@end deffn

@node Shift and Reset
@subsubsection Shift, Reset, and All That

There is a whole zoo of delimited control operators, and as it does not
seem to be a bounded set, Guile implements support for them in a
separate module:

@example
(use-modules (ice-9 control))
@end example

Firstly, we have a helpful abbreviation for the @code{call-with-prompt}
operator.

@deffn {Scheme Syntax} % expr
@deffnx {Scheme Syntax} % expr handler
@deffnx {Scheme Syntax} % tag expr handler
Evaluate @var{expr} in a prompt, optionally specifying a tag and a
handler.  If no tag is given, the default prompt tag is used.

If no handler is given, a default handler is installed.  The default
handler accepts a procedure of one argument, which will called on the
captured continuation, within a prompt.

Sometimes it's easier just to show code, as in this case:

@example
(define (default-prompt-handler k proc)
  (% (default-prompt-tag)
     (proc k)
     default-prompt-handler))
@end example

The @code{%} symbol is chosen because it looks like a prompt.
@end deffn

Likewise there is an abbreviation for @code{abort-to-prompt}, which
assumes the default prompt tag:

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} abort val1 val2 @dots{}
Abort to the default prompt tag, passing @var{val1} @var{val2} @dots{}
to the handler.
@end deffn

As mentioned before, @code{(ice-9 control)} also provides other
delimited control operators.  This section is a bit technical, and
first-time users of delimited continuations should probably come back to
it after some practice with @code{%}.

Still here?  So, when one implements a delimited control operator like
@code{call-with-prompt}, one needs to make two decisions.  Firstly, does
the handler run within or outside the prompt?  Having the handler run
within the prompt allows an abort inside the handler to return to the
same prompt handler, which is often useful.  However it prevents tail
calls from the handler, so it is less general.

Similarly, does invoking a captured continuation reinstate a prompt?
Again we have the tradeoff of convenience versus proper tail calls.

These decisions are captured in the Felleisen @dfn{F} operator.  If
neither the continuations nor the handlers implicitly add a prompt, the
operator is known as @dfn{--F--}.  This is the case for Guile's
@code{call-with-prompt} and @code{abort-to-prompt}.

If both continuation and handler implicitly add prompts, then the
operator is @dfn{+F+}.  @code{shift} and @code{reset} are such
operators.

@deffn {Scheme Syntax} reset body1 body2 @dots{}
Establish a prompt, and evaluate @var{body1} @var{body2} @dots{} within
that prompt.

The prompt handler is designed to work with @code{shift}, described
below.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Syntax} shift cont body1 body2 @dots{}
Abort to the nearest @code{reset}, and evaluate @var{body1} @var{body2}
@dots{} in a context in which the captured continuation is bound to
@var{cont}.

As mentioned above, taken together, the @var{body1} @var{body2} @dots{}
expressions and the invocations of @var{cont} implicitly establish a
prompt.
@end deffn

Interested readers are invited to explore Oleg Kiselyov's wonderful web
site at @uref{http://okmij.org/ftp/}, for more information on these
operators.


@node Continuations
@subsection Continuations
@cindex continuations

A ``continuation'' is the code that will execute when a given function
or expression returns.  For example, consider

@example
(define (foo)
  (display "hello\n")
  (display (bar)) (newline)
  (exit))
@end example

The continuation from the call to @code{bar} comprises a
@code{display} of the value returned, a @code{newline} and an
@code{exit}.  This can be expressed as a function of one argument.

@example
(lambda (r)
  (display r) (newline)
  (exit))
@end example

In Scheme, continuations are represented as special procedures just
like this.  The special property is that when a continuation is called
it abandons the current program location and jumps directly to that
represented by the continuation.

A continuation is like a dynamic label, capturing at run-time a point
in program execution, including all the nested calls that have lead to
it (or rather the code that will execute when those calls return).

Continuations are created with the following functions.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} call-with-current-continuation proc
@deffnx {Scheme Procedure} call/cc proc
@rnindex call-with-current-continuation
Capture the current continuation and call @code{(@var{proc}
@var{cont})} with it.  The return value is the value returned by
@var{proc}, or when @code{(@var{cont} @var{value})} is later invoked,
the return is the @var{value} passed.

Normally @var{cont} should be called with one argument, but when the
location resumed is expecting multiple values (@pxref{Multiple
Values}) then they should be passed as multiple arguments, for
instance @code{(@var{cont} @var{x} @var{y} @var{z})}.

@var{cont} may only be used from the same side of a continuation
barrier as it was created (@pxref{Continuation Barriers}), and in a
multi-threaded program only from the thread in which it was created.

The call to @var{proc} is not part of the continuation captured, it runs
only when the continuation is created.  Often a program will want to
store @var{cont} somewhere for later use; this can be done in
@var{proc}.

The @code{call} in the name @code{call-with-current-continuation}
refers to the way a call to @var{proc} gives the newly created
continuation.  It's not related to the way a call is used later to
invoke that continuation.

@code{call/cc} is an alias for @code{call-with-current-continuation}.
This is in common use since the latter is rather long.
@end deffn

@sp 1
@noindent
Here is a simple example,

@example
(define kont #f)
(format #t "the return is ~a\n"
        (call/cc (lambda (k)
                   (set! kont k)
                   1)))
@result{} the return is 1

(kont 2)
@result{} the return is 2
@end example

@code{call/cc} captures a continuation in which the value returned is
going to be displayed by @code{format}.  The @code{lambda} stores this
in @code{kont} and gives an initial return @code{1} which is
displayed.  The later invocation of @code{kont} resumes the captured
point, but this time returning @code{2}, which is displayed.

When Guile is run interactively, a call to @code{format} like this has
an implicit return back to the read-eval-print loop.  @code{call/cc}
captures that like any other return, which is why interactively
@code{kont} will come back to read more input.

@sp 1
C programmers may note that @code{call/cc} is like @code{setjmp} in
the way it records at runtime a point in program execution.  A call to
a continuation is like a @code{longjmp} in that it abandons the
present location and goes to the recorded one.  Like @code{longjmp},
the value passed to the continuation is the value returned by
@code{call/cc} on resuming there.  However @code{longjmp} can only go
up the program stack, but the continuation mechanism can go anywhere.

When a continuation is invoked, @code{call/cc} and subsequent code
effectively ``returns'' a second time.  It can be confusing to imagine
a function returning more times than it was called.  It may help
instead to think of it being stealthily re-entered and then program
flow going on as normal.

@code{dynamic-wind} (@pxref{Dynamic Wind}) can be used to ensure setup
and cleanup code is run when a program locus is resumed or abandoned
through the continuation mechanism.

@sp 1
Continuations are a powerful mechanism, and can be used to implement
almost any sort of control structure, such as loops, coroutines, or
exception handlers.

However the implementation of continuations in Guile is not as
efficient as one might hope, because Guile is designed to cooperate
with programs written in other languages, such as C, which do not know
about continuations.  Basically continuations are captured by a block
copy of the stack, and resumed by copying back.

For this reason, continuations captured by @code{call/cc} should be used only
when there is no other simple way to achieve the desired result, or when the
elegance of the continuation mechanism outweighs the need for performance.

Escapes upwards from loops or nested functions are generally best
handled with prompts (@pxref{Prompts}).  Coroutines can be
efficiently implemented with cooperating threads (a thread holds a
full program stack but doesn't copy it around the way continuations
do).


@node Multiple Values
@subsection Returning and Accepting Multiple Values

@cindex multiple values
@cindex receive

Scheme allows a procedure to return more than one value to its caller.
This is quite different to other languages which only allow
single-value returns.  Returning multiple values is different from
returning a list (or pair or vector) of values to the caller, because
conceptually not @emph{one} compound object is returned, but several
distinct values.

The primitive procedures for handling multiple values are @code{values}
and @code{call-with-values}.  @code{values} is used for returning
multiple values from a procedure.  This is done by placing a call to
@code{values} with zero or more arguments in tail position in a
procedure body.  @code{call-with-values} combines a procedure returning
multiple values with a procedure which accepts these values as
parameters.

@rnindex values
@deffn {Scheme Procedure} values arg @dots{}
@deffnx {C Function} scm_values (args)
Delivers all of its arguments to its continuation.  Except for
continuations created by the @code{call-with-values} procedure,
all continuations take exactly one value.  The effect of
passing no value or more than one value to continuations that
were not created by @code{call-with-values} is unspecified.

For @code{scm_values}, @var{args} is a list of arguments and the
return is a multiple-values object which the caller can return.  In
the current implementation that object shares structure with
@var{args}, so @var{args} should not be modified subsequently.
@end deffn

@deftypefn {C Function} SCM scm_c_values (SCM *base, size_t n)
@code{scm_c_values} is an alternative to @code{scm_values}.  It creates
a new values object, and copies into it the @var{n} values starting from
@var{base}.

Currently this creates a list and passes it to @code{scm_values}, but we
expect that in the future we will be able to use a more efficient
representation.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} size_t scm_c_nvalues (SCM obj)
If @var{obj} is a multiple-values object, returns the number of values
it contains.  Otherwise returns 1.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} SCM scm_c_value_ref (SCM obj, size_t idx)
Returns the value at the position specified by @var{idx} in
@var{obj}.  Note that @var{obj} will ordinarily be a
multiple-values object, but it need not be.  Any other object
represents a single value (itself), and is handled appropriately.
@end deftypefn

@rnindex call-with-values
@deffn {Scheme Procedure} call-with-values producer consumer
Calls its @var{producer} argument with no values and a
continuation that, when passed some values, calls the
@var{consumer} procedure with those values as arguments.  The
continuation for the call to @var{consumer} is the continuation
of the call to @code{call-with-values}.

@example
(call-with-values (lambda () (values 4 5))
                  (lambda (a b) b))
@result{} 5

@end example
@example
(call-with-values * -)
@result{} -1
@end example
@end deffn

In addition to the fundamental procedures described above, Guile has a
module which exports a syntax called @code{receive}, which is much
more convenient.  This is in the @code{(ice-9 receive)} and is the
same as specified by SRFI-8 (@pxref{SRFI-8}).

@lisp
(use-modules (ice-9 receive))
@end lisp

@deffn {library syntax} receive formals expr body @dots{}
Evaluate the expression @var{expr}, and bind the result values (zero
or more) to the formal arguments in @var{formals}.  @var{formals} is a
list of symbols, like the argument list in a @code{lambda}
(@pxref{Lambda}).  After binding the variables, the expressions in
@var{body} @dots{} are evaluated in order, the return value is the
result from the last expression.

For example getting results from @code{partition} in SRFI-1
(@pxref{SRFI-1}),

@example
(receive (odds evens)
    (partition odd? '(7 4 2 8 3))
  (display odds)
  (display " and ")
  (display evens))
@print{} (7 3) and (4 2 8)
@end example

@end deffn


@node Exceptions
@subsection Exceptions
@cindex error handling
@cindex exception handling

A common requirement in applications is to want to jump
@dfn{non-locally} from the depths of a computation back to, say, the
application's main processing loop.  Usually, the place that is the
target of the jump is somewhere in the calling stack of procedures that
called the procedure that wants to jump back.  For example, typical
logic for a key press driven application might look something like this:

@example
main-loop:
  read the next key press and call dispatch-key

dispatch-key:
  lookup the key in a keymap and call an appropriate procedure,
  say find-file

find-file:
  interactively read the required file name, then call
  find-specified-file

find-specified-file:
  check whether file exists; if not, jump back to main-loop
  @dots{}
@end example

The jump back to @code{main-loop} could be achieved by returning through
the stack one procedure at a time, using the return value of each
procedure to indicate the error condition, but Guile (like most modern
programming languages) provides an additional mechanism called
@dfn{exception handling} that can be used to implement such jumps much
more conveniently.

@menu
* Exception Terminology::       Different ways to say the same thing.
* Catch::                       Setting up to catch exceptions.
* Throw Handlers::              Handling exceptions before unwinding the stack.
* Throw::                       Throwing an exception.
* Exception Implementation::    How Guile implements exceptions.
@end menu


@node Exception Terminology
@subsubsection Exception Terminology

There are several variations on the terminology for dealing with
non-local jumps.  It is useful to be aware of them, and to realize
that they all refer to the same basic mechanism.

@itemize @bullet
@item
Actually making a non-local jump may be called @dfn{raising an
exception}, @dfn{raising a signal}, @dfn{throwing an exception} or
@dfn{doing a long jump}.  When the jump indicates an error condition,
people may talk about @dfn{signalling}, @dfn{raising} or @dfn{throwing}
@dfn{an error}.

@item
Handling the jump at its target may be referred to as @dfn{catching} or
@dfn{handling} the @dfn{exception}, @dfn{signal} or, where an error
condition is involved, @dfn{error}.
@end itemize

Where @dfn{signal} and @dfn{signalling} are used, special care is needed
to avoid the risk of confusion with POSIX signals.

This manual prefers to speak of throwing and catching exceptions, since
this terminology matches the corresponding Guile primitives.

The exception mechanism described in this section has connections with
@dfn{delimited continuations} (@pxref{Prompts}).  In particular,
throwing an exception is akin to invoking an @dfn{escape continuation}
(@pxref{Prompt Primitives, @code{call/ec}}).


@node Catch
@subsubsection Catching Exceptions

@code{catch} is used to set up a target for a possible non-local jump.
The arguments of a @code{catch} expression are a @dfn{key}, which
restricts the set of exceptions to which this @code{catch} applies, a
thunk that specifies the code to execute and one or two @dfn{handler}
procedures that say what to do if an exception is thrown while executing
the code.  If the execution thunk executes @dfn{normally}, which means
without throwing any exceptions, the handler procedures are not called
at all.

When an exception is thrown using the @code{throw} function, the first
argument of the @code{throw} is a symbol that indicates the type of the
exception.  For example, Guile throws an exception using the symbol
@code{numerical-overflow} to indicate numerical overflow errors such as
division by zero:

@lisp
(/ 1 0)
@result{}
ABORT: (numerical-overflow)
@end lisp

The @var{key} argument in a @code{catch} expression corresponds to this
symbol.  @var{key} may be a specific symbol, such as
@code{numerical-overflow}, in which case the @code{catch} applies
specifically to exceptions of that type; or it may be @code{#t}, which
means that the @code{catch} applies to all exceptions, irrespective of
their type.

The second argument of a @code{catch} expression should be a thunk
(i.e.@: a procedure that accepts no arguments) that specifies the normal
case code.  The @code{catch} is active for the execution of this thunk,
including any code called directly or indirectly by the thunk's body.
Evaluation of the @code{catch} expression activates the catch and then
calls this thunk.

The third argument of a @code{catch} expression is a handler procedure.
If an exception is thrown, this procedure is called with exactly the
arguments specified by the @code{throw}.  Therefore, the handler
procedure must be designed to accept a number of arguments that
corresponds to the number of arguments in all @code{throw} expressions
that can be caught by this @code{catch}.

The fourth, optional argument of a @code{catch} expression is another
handler procedure, called the @dfn{pre-unwind} handler.  It differs from
the third argument in that if an exception is thrown, it is called,
@emph{before} the third argument handler, in exactly the dynamic context
of the @code{throw} expression that threw the exception.  This means
that it is useful for capturing or displaying the stack at the point of
the @code{throw}, or for examining other aspects of the dynamic context,
such as fluid values, before the context is unwound back to that of the
prevailing @code{catch}.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} catch key thunk handler [pre-unwind-handler]
@deffnx {C Function} scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler (key, thunk, handler, pre_unwind_handler)
@deffnx {C Function} scm_catch (key, thunk, handler)
Invoke @var{thunk} in the dynamic context of @var{handler} for
exceptions matching @var{key}.  If thunk throws to the symbol
@var{key}, then @var{handler} is invoked this way:
@lisp
(handler key args ...)
@end lisp

@var{key} is a symbol or @code{#t}.

@var{thunk} takes no arguments.  If @var{thunk} returns
normally, that is the return value of @code{catch}.

Handler is invoked outside the scope of its own @code{catch}.
If @var{handler} again throws to the same key, a new handler
from further up the call chain is invoked.

If the key is @code{#t}, then a throw to @emph{any} symbol will
match this call to @code{catch}.

If a @var{pre-unwind-handler} is given and @var{thunk} throws
an exception that matches @var{key}, Guile calls the
@var{pre-unwind-handler} before unwinding the dynamic state and
invoking the main @var{handler}.  @var{pre-unwind-handler} should
be a procedure with the same signature as @var{handler}, that
is @code{(lambda (key . args))}.  It is typically used to save
the stack at the point where the exception occurred, but can also
query other parts of the dynamic state at that point, such as
fluid values.

A @var{pre-unwind-handler} can exit either normally or non-locally.
If it exits normally, Guile unwinds the stack and dynamic context
and then calls the normal (third argument) handler.  If it exits
non-locally, that exit determines the continuation.
@end deffn

If a handler procedure needs to match a variety of @code{throw}
expressions with varying numbers of arguments, you should write it like
this:

@lisp
(lambda (key . args)
  @dots{})
@end lisp

@noindent
The @var{key} argument is guaranteed always to be present, because a
@code{throw} without a @var{key} is not valid.  The number and
interpretation of the @var{args} varies from one type of exception to
another, but should be specified by the documentation for each exception
type.

Note that, once the normal (post-unwind) handler procedure is invoked,
the catch that led to the handler procedure being called is no longer
active.  Therefore, if the handler procedure itself throws an exception,
that exception can only be caught by another active catch higher up the
call stack, if there is one.

@sp 1
@deftypefn {C Function} SCM scm_c_catch (SCM tag, scm_t_catch_body body, void *body_data, scm_t_catch_handler handler, void *handler_data, scm_t_catch_handler pre_unwind_handler, void *pre_unwind_handler_data)
@deftypefnx {C Function} SCM scm_internal_catch (SCM tag, scm_t_catch_body body, void *body_data, scm_t_catch_handler handler, void *handler_data)
The above @code{scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler} and @code{scm_catch}
take Scheme procedures as body and handler arguments.
@code{scm_c_catch} and @code{scm_internal_catch} are equivalents taking
C functions.

@var{body} is called as @code{@var{body} (@var{body_data})} with a catch
on exceptions of the given @var{tag} type.  If an exception is caught,
@var{pre_unwind_handler} and @var{handler} are called as
@code{@var{handler} (@var{handler_data}, @var{key}, @var{args})}.
@var{key} and @var{args} are the @code{SCM} key and argument list from
the @code{throw}.

@tpindex scm_t_catch_body
@tpindex scm_t_catch_handler
@var{body} and @var{handler} should have the following prototypes.
@code{scm_t_catch_body} and @code{scm_t_catch_handler} are pointer
typedefs for these.

@example
SCM body (void *data);
SCM handler (void *data, SCM key, SCM args);
@end example

The @var{body_data} and @var{handler_data} parameters are passed to
the respective calls so an application can communicate extra
information to those functions.

If the data consists of an @code{SCM} object, care should be taken that
it isn't garbage collected while still required.  If the @code{SCM} is a
local C variable, one way to protect it is to pass a pointer to that
variable as the data parameter, since the C compiler will then know the
value must be held on the stack.  Another way is to use
@code{scm_remember_upto_here_1} (@pxref{Foreign Object Memory
Management}).
@end deftypefn


@node Throw Handlers
@subsubsection Throw Handlers

It's sometimes useful to be able to intercept an exception that is being
thrown before the stack is unwound. This could be to clean up some
related state, to print a backtrace, or to pass information about the
exception to a debugger, for example. The @code{with-throw-handler}
procedure provides a way to do this.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} with-throw-handler key thunk handler
@deffnx {C Function} scm_with_throw_handler (key, thunk, handler)
Add @var{handler} to the dynamic context as a throw handler
for key @var{key}, then invoke @var{thunk}.

This behaves exactly like @code{catch}, except that it does not unwind
the stack before invoking @var{handler}. If the @var{handler} procedure
returns normally, Guile rethrows the same exception again to the next
innermost catch or throw handler. @var{handler} may exit nonlocally, of
course, via an explicit throw or via invoking a continuation.
@end deffn

Typically @var{handler} is used to display a backtrace of the stack at
the point where the corresponding @code{throw} occurred, or to save off
this information for possible display later.

Not unwinding the stack means that throwing an exception that is handled
via a throw handler is equivalent to calling the throw handler handler
inline instead of each @code{throw}, and then omitting the surrounding
@code{with-throw-handler}. In other words,

@lisp
(with-throw-handler 'key
  (lambda () @dots{} (throw 'key args @dots{}) @dots{})
  handler)
@end lisp

@noindent
is mostly equivalent to

@lisp
((lambda () @dots{} (handler 'key args @dots{}) @dots{}))
@end lisp

In particular, the dynamic context when @var{handler} is invoked is that
of the site where @code{throw} is called. The examples are not quite
equivalent, because the body of a @code{with-throw-handler} is not in
tail position with respect to the @code{with-throw-handler}, and if
@var{handler} exits normally, Guile arranges to rethrow the error, but
hopefully the intention is clear. (For an introduction to what is meant
by dynamic context, @xref{Dynamic Wind}.)

@deftypefn {C Function} SCM scm_c_with_throw_handler (SCM tag, scm_t_catch_body body, void *body_data, scm_t_catch_handler handler, void *handler_data, int lazy_catch_p)
The above @code{scm_with_throw_handler} takes Scheme procedures as body
(thunk) and handler arguments.  @code{scm_c_with_throw_handler} is an
equivalent taking C functions.  See @code{scm_c_catch} (@pxref{Catch})
for a description of the parameters, the behaviour however of course
follows @code{with-throw-handler}.
@end deftypefn

If @var{thunk} throws an exception, Guile handles that exception by
invoking the innermost @code{catch} or throw handler whose key matches
that of the exception.  When the innermost thing is a throw handler,
Guile calls the specified handler procedure using @code{(apply
@var{handler} key args)}.  The handler procedure may either return
normally or exit non-locally.  If it returns normally, Guile passes the
exception on to the next innermost @code{catch} or throw handler.  If it
exits non-locally, that exit determines the continuation.

The behaviour of a throw handler is very similar to that of a
@code{catch} expression's optional pre-unwind handler.  In particular, a
throw handler's handler procedure is invoked in the exact dynamic
context of the @code{throw} expression, just as a pre-unwind handler is.
@code{with-throw-handler} may be seen as a half-@code{catch}: it does
everything that a @code{catch} would do until the point where
@code{catch} would start unwinding the stack and dynamic context, but
then it rethrows to the next innermost @code{catch} or throw handler
instead.

Note also that since the dynamic context is not unwound, if a
@code{with-throw-handler} handler throws to a key that does not match
the @code{with-throw-handler} expression's @var{key}, the new throw may
be handled by a @code{catch} or throw handler that is @emph{closer} to
the throw than the first @code{with-throw-handler}.

Here is an example to illustrate this behavior:

@lisp
(catch 'a
  (lambda ()
    (with-throw-handler 'b
      (lambda ()
        (catch 'a
          (lambda ()
            (throw 'b))
          inner-handler))
      (lambda (key . args)
        (throw 'a))))
  outer-handler)
@end lisp

@noindent
This code will call @code{inner-handler} and then continue with the
continuation of the inner @code{catch}.


@node Throw
@subsubsection Throwing Exceptions

The @code{throw} primitive is used to throw an exception.  One argument,
the @var{key}, is mandatory, and must be a symbol; it indicates the type
of exception that is being thrown.  Following the @var{key},
@code{throw} accepts any number of additional arguments, whose meaning
depends on the exception type.  The documentation for each possible type
of exception should specify the additional arguments that are expected
for that kind of exception.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} throw key arg @dots{}
@deffnx {C Function} scm_throw (key, args)
Invoke the catch form matching @var{key}, passing @var{arg} @dots{} to
the @var{handler}.

@var{key} is a symbol.  It will match catches of the same symbol or of
@code{#t}.

If there is no handler at all, Guile prints an error and then exits.
@end deffn

When an exception is thrown, it will be caught by the innermost
@code{catch} or throw handler that applies to the type of the thrown
exception; in other words, whose @var{key} is either @code{#t} or the
same symbol as that used in the @code{throw} expression.  Once Guile has
identified the appropriate @code{catch} or throw handler, it handles the
exception by applying the relevant handler procedure(s) to the arguments
of the @code{throw}.

If there is no appropriate @code{catch} or throw handler for a thrown
exception, Guile prints an error to the current error port indicating an
uncaught exception, and then exits.  In practice, it is quite difficult
to observe this behaviour, because Guile when used interactively
installs a top level @code{catch} handler that will catch all exceptions
and print an appropriate error message @emph{without} exiting.  For
example, this is what happens if you try to throw an unhandled exception
in the standard Guile REPL; note that Guile's command loop continues
after the error message:

@lisp
guile> (throw 'badex)
<unnamed port>:3:1: In procedure gsubr-apply @dots{}
<unnamed port>:3:1: unhandled-exception: badex
ABORT: (misc-error)
guile> 
@end lisp

The default uncaught exception behaviour can be observed by evaluating a
@code{throw} expression from the shell command line:

@example
$ guile -c "(begin (throw 'badex) (display \"here\\n\"))"
guile: uncaught throw to badex: ()
$ 
@end example

@noindent
That Guile exits immediately following the uncaught exception
is shown by the absence of any output from the @code{display}
expression, because Guile never gets to the point of evaluating that
expression.


@node Exception Implementation
@subsubsection How Guile Implements Exceptions

It is traditional in Scheme to implement exception systems using
@code{call-with-current-continuation}.  Continuations
(@pxref{Continuations}) are such a powerful concept that any other
control mechanism --- including @code{catch} and @code{throw} --- can be
implemented in terms of them.

Guile does not implement @code{catch} and @code{throw} like this,
though.  Why not?  Because Guile is specifically designed to be easy to
integrate with applications written in C.  In a mixed Scheme/C
environment, the concept of @dfn{continuation} must logically include
``what happens next'' in the C parts of the application as well as the
Scheme parts, and it turns out that the only reasonable way of
implementing continuations like this is to save and restore the complete
C stack.

So Guile's implementation of @code{call-with-current-continuation} is a
stack copying one.  This allows it to interact well with ordinary C
code, but means that creating and calling a continuation is slowed down
by the time that it takes to copy the C stack.

The more targeted mechanism provided by @code{catch} and @code{throw}
does not need to save and restore the C stack because the @code{throw}
always jumps to a location higher up the stack of the code that executes
the @code{throw}.  Therefore Guile implements the @code{catch} and
@code{throw} primitives independently of
@code{call-with-current-continuation}, in a way that takes advantage of
this @emph{upwards only} nature of exceptions.


@node Error Reporting
@subsection Procedures for Signaling Errors

Guile provides a set of convenience procedures for signaling error
conditions that are implemented on top of the exception primitives just
described.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} error msg arg @dots{}
Raise an error with key @code{misc-error} and a message constructed by
displaying @var{msg} and writing @var{arg} @enddots{}.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} scm-error key subr message args data
@deffnx {C Function} scm_error_scm (key, subr, message, args, data)
Raise an error with key @var{key}.  @var{subr} can be a string
naming the procedure associated with the error, or @code{#f}.
@var{message} is the error message string, possibly containing
@code{~S} and @code{~A} escapes.  When an error is reported,
these are replaced by formatting the corresponding members of
@var{args}: @code{~A} (was @code{%s} in older versions of
Guile) formats using @code{display} and @code{~S} (was
@code{%S}) formats using @code{write}.  @var{data} is a list or
@code{#f} depending on @var{key}: if @var{key} is
@code{system-error} then it should be a list containing the
Unix @code{errno} value; If @var{key} is @code{signal} then it
should be a list containing the Unix signal number; If
@var{key} is @code{out-of-range}, @code{wrong-type-arg},
or @code{keyword-argument-error},
it is a list containing the bad value; otherwise
it will usually be @code{#f}.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} strerror err
@deffnx {C Function} scm_strerror (err)
Return the Unix error message corresponding to @var{err}, an integer
@code{errno} value.

When @code{setlocale} has been called (@pxref{Locales}), the message
is in the language and charset of @code{LC_MESSAGES}.  (This is done
by the C library.)
@end deffn

@c begin (scm-doc-string "boot-9.scm" "false-if-exception")
@deffn syntax false-if-exception expr
Returns the result of evaluating its argument; however
if an exception occurs then @code{#f} is returned instead.
@end deffn
@c end


@node Dynamic Wind
@subsection Dynamic Wind

For Scheme code, the fundamental procedure to react to non-local entry
and exits of dynamic contexts is @code{dynamic-wind}.  C code could
use @code{scm_internal_dynamic_wind}, but since C does not allow the
convenient construction of anonymous procedures that close over
lexical variables, this will be, well, inconvenient.

Therefore, Guile offers the functions @code{scm_dynwind_begin} and
@code{scm_dynwind_end} to delimit a dynamic extent.  Within this
dynamic extent, which is called a @dfn{dynwind context}, you can
perform various @dfn{dynwind actions} that control what happens when
the dynwind context is entered or left.  For example, you can register
a cleanup routine with @code{scm_dynwind_unwind_handler} that is
executed when the context is left.  There are several other more
specialized dynwind actions as well, for example to temporarily block
the execution of asyncs or to temporarily change the current output
port.  They are described elsewhere in this manual.

Here is an example that shows how to prevent memory leaks.

@example

/* Suppose there is a function called FOO in some library that you
   would like to make available to Scheme code (or to C code that
   follows the Scheme conventions).

   FOO takes two C strings and returns a new string.  When an error has
   occurred in FOO, it returns NULL.
*/

char *foo (char *s1, char *s2);

/* SCM_FOO interfaces the C function FOO to the Scheme way of life.
   It takes care to free up all temporary strings in the case of
   non-local exits.
 */

SCM
scm_foo (SCM s1, SCM s2)
@{
  char *c_s1, *c_s2, *c_res;

  scm_dynwind_begin (0);

  c_s1 = scm_to_locale_string (s1);

  /* Call 'free (c_s1)' when the dynwind context is left. 
  */
  scm_dynwind_unwind_handler (free, c_s1, SCM_F_WIND_EXPLICITLY);

  c_s2 = scm_to_locale_string (s2);
  
  /* Same as above, but more concisely.
  */
  scm_dynwind_free (c_s2);

  c_res = foo (c_s1, c_s2);
  if (c_res == NULL)
    scm_memory_error ("foo");

  scm_dynwind_end ();

  return scm_take_locale_string (res);
@}
@end example

@rnindex dynamic-wind
@deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-wind in_guard thunk out_guard
@deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_wind (in_guard, thunk, out_guard)
All three arguments must be 0-argument procedures.
@var{in_guard} is called, then @var{thunk}, then
@var{out_guard}.

If, any time during the execution of @var{thunk}, the
dynamic extent of the @code{dynamic-wind} expression is escaped
non-locally, @var{out_guard} is called.  If the dynamic extent of
the dynamic-wind is re-entered, @var{in_guard} is called.  Thus
@var{in_guard} and @var{out_guard} may be called any number of
times.

@lisp
(define x 'normal-binding)
@result{} x
(define a-cont
  (call-with-current-continuation
   (lambda (escape)
     (let ((old-x x))
       (dynamic-wind
           ;; in-guard:
           ;;
           (lambda () (set! x 'special-binding))

           ;; thunk
           ;;
           (lambda () (display x) (newline)
                      (call-with-current-continuation escape)
                      (display x) (newline)
                      x)

           ;; out-guard:
           ;;
           (lambda () (set! x old-x)))))))
;; Prints:
special-binding
;; Evaluates to:
@result{} a-cont
x
@result{} normal-binding
(a-cont #f)
;; Prints:
special-binding
;; Evaluates to:
@result{} a-cont  ;; the value of the (define a-cont...)
x
@result{} normal-binding
a-cont
@result{} special-binding
@end lisp
@end deffn

@deftp {C Type} scm_t_dynwind_flags
This is an enumeration of several flags that modify the behavior of
@code{scm_dynwind_begin}.  The flags are listed in the following
table.

@table @code
@item SCM_F_DYNWIND_REWINDABLE
The dynamic context is @dfn{rewindable}.  This means that it can be
reentered non-locally (via the invocation of a continuation).  The
default is that a dynwind context can not be reentered non-locally.
@end table

@end deftp

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_dynwind_begin (scm_t_dynwind_flags flags)
The function @code{scm_dynwind_begin} starts a new dynamic context and
makes it the `current' one.

The @var{flags} argument determines the default behavior of the
context.  Normally, use 0.  This will result in a context that can not
be reentered with a captured continuation.  When you are prepared to
handle reentries, include @code{SCM_F_DYNWIND_REWINDABLE} in
@var{flags}.

Being prepared for reentry means that the effects of unwind handlers
can be undone on reentry.  In the example above, we want to prevent a
memory leak on non-local exit and thus register an unwind handler that
frees the memory.  But once the memory is freed, we can not get it
back on reentry.  Thus reentry can not be allowed.

The consequence is that continuations become less useful when
non-reentrant contexts are captured, but you don't need to worry
about that too much.

The context is ended either implicitly when a non-local exit happens,
or explicitly with @code{scm_dynwind_end}.  You must make sure that a
dynwind context is indeed ended properly.  If you fail to call
@code{scm_dynwind_end} for each @code{scm_dynwind_begin}, the behavior
is undefined.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_dynwind_end ()
End the current dynamic context explicitly and make the previous one
current.
@end deftypefn

@deftp {C Type} scm_t_wind_flags
This is an enumeration of several flags that modify the behavior of
@code{scm_dynwind_unwind_handler} and
@code{scm_dynwind_rewind_handler}.  The flags are listed in the
following table.

@table @code
@item SCM_F_WIND_EXPLICITLY
@vindex SCM_F_WIND_EXPLICITLY
The registered action is also carried out when the dynwind context is
entered or left locally.
@end table
@end deftp

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_dynwind_unwind_handler (void (*func)(void *), void *data, scm_t_wind_flags flags)
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_dynwind_unwind_handler_with_scm (void (*func)(SCM), SCM data, scm_t_wind_flags flags)
Arranges for @var{func} to be called with @var{data} as its arguments
when the current context ends implicitly.  If @var{flags} contains
@code{SCM_F_WIND_EXPLICITLY}, @var{func} is also called when the
context ends explicitly with @code{scm_dynwind_end}.

The function @code{scm_dynwind_unwind_handler_with_scm} takes care that
@var{data} is protected from garbage collection.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_dynwind_rewind_handler (void (*func)(void *), void *data, scm_t_wind_flags flags)
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_dynwind_rewind_handler_with_scm (void (*func)(SCM), SCM data, scm_t_wind_flags flags)
Arrange for @var{func} to be called with @var{data} as its argument when
the current context is restarted by rewinding the stack.  When @var{flags}
contains @code{SCM_F_WIND_EXPLICITLY}, @var{func} is called immediately
as well.

The function @code{scm_dynwind_rewind_handler_with_scm} takes care that
@var{data} is protected from garbage collection.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_dynwind_free (void *mem)
Arrange for @var{mem} to be freed automatically whenever the current
context is exited, whether normally or non-locally.
@code{scm_dynwind_free (mem)} is an equivalent shorthand for
@code{scm_dynwind_unwind_handler (free, mem, SCM_F_WIND_EXPLICITLY)}.
@end deftypefn


@node Fluids and Dynamic States
@subsection Fluids and Dynamic States

@cindex fluids

A @emph{fluid} is a variable whose value is associated with the dynamic
extent of a function call.  In the same way that an operating system
runs a process with a given set of current input and output ports (or
file descriptors), in Guile you can arrange to call a function while
binding a fluid to a particular value.  That association between fluid
and value will exist during the dynamic extent of the function call.

Fluids are a therefore a building block for implementing dynamically
scoped variables.  Dynamically scoped variables are useful when you want
to set a variable to a value during some dynamic extent in the execution
of your program and have them revert to their original value when the
control flow is outside of this dynamic extent.  See the description of
@code{with-fluids} below for details.  This association between fluids,
values, and dynamic extents is robust to multiple entries (as when a
captured continuation is invoked more than once) and early exits (for
example, when throwing exceptions).

Guile uses fluids to implement parameters (@pxref{Parameters}).  Usually
you just want to use parameters directly.  However it can be useful to
know what a fluid is and how it works, so that's what this section is
about.

The current set of fluid-value associations can be captured in a
@emph{dynamic state} object.  A dynamic extent is simply that: a
snapshot of the current fluid-value associations.  Guile users can
capture the current dynamic state with @code{current-dynamic-state} and
restore it later via @code{with-dynamic-state} or similar procedures.
This facility is especially useful when implementing lightweight
thread-like abstractions.

New fluids are created with @code{make-fluid} and @code{fluid?} is
used for testing whether an object is actually a fluid.  The values
stored in a fluid can be accessed with @code{fluid-ref} and
@code{fluid-set!}.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} make-fluid [dflt]
@deffnx {C Function} scm_make_fluid ()
@deffnx {C Function} scm_make_fluid_with_default (dflt)
Return a newly created fluid, whose initial value is @var{dflt}, or
@code{#f} if @var{dflt} is not given.
Fluids are objects that can hold one
value per dynamic state.  That is, modifications to this value are
only visible to code that executes with the same dynamic state as
the modifying code.  When a new dynamic state is constructed, it
inherits the values from its parent.  Because each thread normally executes
with its own dynamic state, you can use fluids for thread local storage.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} make-unbound-fluid
@deffnx {C Function} scm_make_unbound_fluid ()
Return a new fluid that is initially unbound (instead of being
implicitly bound to some definite value).
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} fluid? obj
@deffnx {C Function} scm_fluid_p (obj)
Return @code{#t} if @var{obj} is a fluid; otherwise, return
@code{#f}.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} fluid-ref fluid
@deffnx {C Function} scm_fluid_ref (fluid)
Return the value associated with @var{fluid} in the current
dynamic root.  If @var{fluid} has not been set, then return
its default value. Calling @code{fluid-ref} on an unbound fluid produces
a runtime error.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} fluid-set! fluid value
@deffnx {C Function} scm_fluid_set_x (fluid, value)
Set the value associated with @var{fluid} in the current dynamic root.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} fluid-ref* fluid depth
@deffnx {C Function} scm_fluid_ref_star (fluid, depth)
Return the @var{depth}th oldest value associated with @var{fluid} in the
current thread.  If @var{depth} equals or exceeds the number of values
that have been assigned to @var{fluid}, return the default value of the
fluid.  @code{(fluid-ref* f 0)} is equivalent to @code{(fluid-ref f)}.

@code{fluid-ref*} is useful when you want to maintain a stack-like
structure in a fluid, such as the stack of current exception handlers.
Using @code{fluid-ref*} instead of an explicit stack allows any partial
continuation captured by @code{call-with-prompt} to only capture the
bindings made within the limits of the prompt instead of the entire
continuation.  @xref{Prompts}, for more on delimited continuations.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} fluid-unset! fluid
@deffnx {C Function} scm_fluid_unset_x (fluid)
Disassociate the given fluid from any value, making it unbound.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} fluid-bound? fluid
@deffnx {C Function} scm_fluid_bound_p (fluid)
Returns @code{#t} if the given fluid is bound to a value, otherwise
@code{#f}.
@end deffn

@code{with-fluids*} temporarily changes the values of one or more fluids,
so that the given procedure and each procedure called by it access the
given values.  After the procedure returns, the old values are restored.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} with-fluid* fluid value thunk
@deffnx {C Function} scm_with_fluid (fluid, value, thunk)
Set @var{fluid} to @var{value} temporarily, and call @var{thunk}.
@var{thunk} must be a procedure with no argument.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} with-fluids* fluids values thunk
@deffnx {C Function} scm_with_fluids (fluids, values, thunk)
Set @var{fluids} to @var{values} temporary, and call @var{thunk}.
@var{fluids} must be a list of fluids and @var{values} must be the
same number of their values to be applied.  Each substitution is done
in the order given.  @var{thunk} must be a procedure with no argument.
It is called inside a @code{dynamic-wind} and the fluids are
set/restored when control enter or leaves the established dynamic
extent.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Macro} with-fluids ((fluid value) @dots{}) body1 body2 @dots{}
Execute body @var{body1} @var{body2} @dots{}  while each @var{fluid} is
set to the corresponding @var{value}.  Both @var{fluid} and @var{value}
are evaluated and @var{fluid} must yield a fluid.  The body is executed
inside a @code{dynamic-wind} and the fluids are set/restored when
control enter or leaves the established dynamic extent.
@end deffn

@deftypefn {C Function} SCM scm_c_with_fluids (SCM fluids, SCM vals, SCM (*cproc)(void *), void *data)
@deftypefnx {C Function} SCM scm_c_with_fluid (SCM fluid, SCM val, SCM (*cproc)(void *), void *data)
The function @code{scm_c_with_fluids} is like @code{scm_with_fluids}
except that it takes a C function to call instead of a Scheme thunk.

The function @code{scm_c_with_fluid} is similar but only allows one
fluid to be set instead of a list.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_dynwind_fluid (SCM fluid, SCM val)
This function must be used inside a pair of calls to
@code{scm_dynwind_begin} and @code{scm_dynwind_end} (@pxref{Dynamic
Wind}).  During the dynwind context, the fluid @var{fluid} is set to
@var{val}.

More precisely, the value of the fluid is swapped with a `backup'
value whenever the dynwind context is entered or left.  The backup
value is initialized with the @var{val} argument.
@end deftypefn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} dynamic-state? obj
@deffnx {C Function} scm_dynamic_state_p (obj)
Return @code{#t} if @var{obj} is a dynamic state object;
return @code{#f} otherwise.
@end deffn

@deftypefn {C Procedure} int scm_is_dynamic_state (SCM obj)
Return non-zero if @var{obj} is a dynamic state object;
return zero otherwise.
@end deftypefn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} current-dynamic-state
@deffnx {C Function} scm_current_dynamic_state ()
Return a snapshot of the current fluid-value associations as a fresh
dynamic state object.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} set-current-dynamic-state state
@deffnx {C Function} scm_set_current_dynamic_state (state)
Restore the saved fluid-value associations from @var{state}, replacing
the current fluid-value associations.  Return the current fluid-value
associatoins as a dynamic state object, as in
@code{current-dynamic-state}.
@end deffn

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} with-dynamic-state state proc
@deffnx {C Function} scm_with_dynamic_state (state, proc)
Call @var{proc} while the fluid bindings from @var{state} have been made
current, saving the current fluid bindings.  When control leaves the
invocation of @var{proc}, restore the saved bindings, saving instead the
fluid bindings from inside the call.  If control later re-enters
@var{proc}, restore those saved bindings, saving the current bindings,
and so on.
@end deffn

@deftypefn {C Procedure} void scm_dynwind_current_dynamic_state (SCM state)
Set the current dynamic state to @var{state} for the current dynwind
context.  Like @code{with-dynamic-state}, but in terms of Guile's
``dynwind'' C API.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Procedure} {void *} scm_c_with_dynamic_state (SCM state, void *(*func)(void *), void *data)
Like @code{scm_with_dynamic_state}, but call @var{func} with
@var{data}.
@end deftypefn

@node Parameters
@subsection Parameters

@cindex SRFI-39
@cindex parameter object
@tindex Parameter

Parameters are Guile's facility for dynamically bound variables.

On the most basic level, a parameter object is a procedure.  Calling it
with no arguments returns its value.  Calling it with one argument sets
the value.

@example
(define my-param (make-parameter 123))
(my-param) @result{} 123
(my-param 456)
(my-param) @result{} 456
@end example

The @code{parameterize} special form establishes new locations for
parameters, those new locations having effect within the dynamic extent
of the @code{parameterize} body.  Leaving restores the previous
locations.  Re-entering (through a saved continuation) will again use
the new locations.

@example
(parameterize ((my-param 789))
  (my-param)) @result{} 789
(my-param) @result{} 456
@end example

Parameters are like dynamically bound variables in other Lisp dialects.
They allow an application to establish parameter settings (as the name
suggests) just for the execution of a particular bit of code, restoring
when done.  Examples of such parameters might be case-sensitivity for a
search, or a prompt for user input.

Global variables are not as good as parameter objects for this sort of
thing.  Changes to them are visible to all threads, but in Guile
parameter object locations are per-thread, thereby truly limiting the
effect of @code{parameterize} to just its dynamic execution.

Passing arguments to functions is thread-safe, but that soon becomes
tedious when there's more than a few or when they need to pass down
through several layers of calls before reaching the point they should
affect.  Introducing a new setting to existing code is often easier with
a parameter object than adding arguments.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} make-parameter init [converter]
Return a new parameter object, with initial value @var{init}.

If a @var{converter} is given, then a call @code{(@var{converter}
val)} is made for each value set, its return is the value stored.
Such a call is made for the @var{init} initial value too.

A @var{converter} allows values to be validated, or put into a
canonical form.  For example,

@example
(define my-param (make-parameter 123
                   (lambda (val)
                     (if (not (number? val))
                         (error "must be a number"))
                     (inexact->exact val))))
(my-param 0.75)
(my-param) @result{} 3/4
@end example
@end deffn

@deffn {library syntax} parameterize ((param value) @dots{}) body1 body2 @dots{}
Establish a new dynamic scope with the given @var{param}s bound to new
locations and set to the given @var{value}s.  @var{body1} @var{body2}
@dots{} is evaluated in that environment.  The value returned is that of
last body form.

Each @var{param} is an expression which is evaluated to get the
parameter object.  Often this will just be the name of a variable
holding the object, but it can be anything that evaluates to a
parameter.

The @var{param} expressions and @var{value} expressions are all
evaluated before establishing the new dynamic bindings, and they're
evaluated in an unspecified order.

For example,

@example
(define prompt (make-parameter "Type something: "))
(define (get-input)
  (display (prompt))
  ...)

(parameterize ((prompt "Type a number: "))
  (get-input)
  ...)
@end example
@end deffn

Parameter objects are implemented using fluids (@pxref{Fluids and
Dynamic States}), so each dynamic state has its own parameter
locations.  That includes the separate locations when outside any
@code{parameterize} form.  When a parameter is created it gets a
separate initial location in each dynamic state, all initialized to the
given @var{init} value.

New code should probably just use parameters instead of fluids, because
the interface is better.  But for migrating old code or otherwise
providing interoperability, Guile provides the @code{fluid->parameter}
procedure:

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} fluid->parameter fluid [conv]
Make a parameter that wraps a fluid.

The value of the parameter will be the same as the value of the fluid.
If the parameter is rebound in some dynamic extent, perhaps via
@code{parameterize}, the new value will be run through the optional
@var{conv} procedure, as with any parameter.  Note that unlike
@code{make-parameter}, @var{conv} is not applied to the initial value.
@end deffn

As alluded to above, because each thread usually has a separate dynamic
state, each thread has its own locations behind parameter objects, and
changes in one thread are not visible to any other.  When a new dynamic
state or thread is created, the values of parameters in the originating
context are copied, into new locations.

@cindex SRFI-39
Guile's parameters conform to SRFI-39 (@pxref{SRFI-39}).


@node Handling Errors
@subsection How to Handle Errors

Error handling is based on @code{catch} and @code{throw}.  Errors are
always thrown with a @var{key} and four arguments:

@itemize @bullet
@item
@var{key}: a symbol which indicates the type of error.  The symbols used
by libguile are listed below.

@item
@var{subr}: the name of the procedure from which the error is thrown, or
@code{#f}.

@item
@var{message}: a string (possibly language and system dependent)
describing the error.  The tokens @code{~A} and @code{~S} can be
embedded within the message: they will be replaced with members of the
@var{args} list when the message is printed.  @code{~A} indicates an
argument printed using @code{display}, while @code{~S} indicates an
argument printed using @code{write}.  @var{message} can also be
@code{#f}, to allow it to be derived from the @var{key} by the error
handler (may be useful if the @var{key} is to be thrown from both C and
Scheme).

@item
@var{args}: a list of arguments to be used to expand @code{~A} and
@code{~S} tokens in @var{message}.  Can also be @code{#f} if no
arguments are required.

@item
@var{rest}: a list of any additional objects required. e.g., when the
key is @code{'system-error}, this contains the C errno value.  Can also
be @code{#f} if no additional objects are required.
@end itemize

In addition to @code{catch} and @code{throw}, the following Scheme
facilities are available:

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} display-error frame port subr message args rest
@deffnx {C Function} scm_display_error (frame, port, subr, message, args, rest)
Display an error message to the output port @var{port}.
@var{frame} is the frame in which the error occurred, @var{subr} is
the name of the procedure in which the error occurred and
@var{message} is the actual error message, which may contain
formatting instructions. These will format the arguments in
the list @var{args} accordingly.  @var{rest} is currently
ignored.
@end deffn

The following are the error keys defined by libguile and the situations
in which they are used:

@itemize @bullet
@item
@cindex @code{error-signal}
@code{error-signal}: thrown after receiving an unhandled fatal signal
such as SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGFPE etc.  The @var{rest} argument in the throw
contains the coded signal number (at present this is not the same as the
usual Unix signal number).

@item
@cindex @code{system-error}
@code{system-error}: thrown after the operating system indicates an
error condition.  The @var{rest} argument in the throw contains the
errno value.

@item
@cindex @code{numerical-overflow}
@code{numerical-overflow}: numerical overflow.

@item
@cindex @code{out-of-range}
@code{out-of-range}: the arguments to a procedure do not fall within the
accepted domain.

@item
@cindex @code{wrong-type-arg}
@code{wrong-type-arg}: an argument to a procedure has the wrong type.

@item
@cindex @code{wrong-number-of-args}
@code{wrong-number-of-args}: a procedure was called with the wrong number
of arguments.

@item
@cindex @code{memory-allocation-error}
@code{memory-allocation-error}: memory allocation error.

@item
@cindex @code{stack-overflow}
@code{stack-overflow}: stack overflow error.

@item
@cindex @code{regular-expression-syntax}
@code{regular-expression-syntax}: errors generated by the regular
expression library.

@item
@cindex @code{misc-error}
@code{misc-error}: other errors.
@end itemize


@subsubsection C Support

In the following C functions, @var{SUBR} and @var{MESSAGE} parameters
can be @code{NULL} to give the effect of @code{#f} described above.

@deftypefn {C Function} SCM scm_error (SCM @var{key}, char *@var{subr}, char *@var{message}, SCM @var{args}, SCM @var{rest})
Throw an error, as per @code{scm-error} (@pxref{Error Reporting}).
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_syserror (char *@var{subr})
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_syserror_msg (char *@var{subr}, char *@var{message}, SCM @var{args})
Throw an error with key @code{system-error} and supply @code{errno} in
the @var{rest} argument.  For @code{scm_syserror} the message is
generated using @code{strerror}.

Care should be taken that any code in between the failing operation
and the call to these routines doesn't change @code{errno}.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn {C Function} void scm_num_overflow (char *@var{subr})
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_out_of_range (char *@var{subr}, SCM @var{bad_value})
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_wrong_num_args (SCM @var{proc})
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_wrong_type_arg (char *@var{subr}, int @var{argnum}, SCM @var{bad_value})
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_wrong_type_arg_msg (char *@var{subr}, int @var{argnum}, SCM @var{bad_value}, const char *@var{expected})
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_memory_error (char *@var{subr})
@deftypefnx {C Function} void scm_misc_error (const char *@var{subr}, const char *@var{message}, SCM @var{args})
Throw an error with the various keys described above.

In @code{scm_wrong_num_args}, @var{proc} should be a Scheme symbol
which is the name of the procedure incorrectly invoked.  The other
routines take the name of the invoked procedure as a C string.

In @code{scm_wrong_type_arg_msg}, @var{expected} is a C string
describing the type of argument that was expected.

In @code{scm_misc_error}, @var{message} is the error message string,
possibly containing @code{simple-format} escapes (@pxref{Simple
Output}), and the corresponding arguments in the @var{args} list.
@end deftypefn


@subsubsection Signalling Type Errors

Every function visible at the Scheme level should aggressively check the
types of its arguments, to avoid misinterpreting a value, and perhaps
causing a segmentation fault.  Guile provides some macros to make this
easier.

@deftypefn Macro void SCM_ASSERT (int @var{test}, SCM @var{obj}, unsigned int @var{position}, const char *@var{subr})
@deftypefnx Macro void SCM_ASSERT_TYPE (int @var{test}, SCM @var{obj}, unsigned int @var{position}, const char *@var{subr}, const char *@var{expected}) 
If @var{test} is zero, signal a ``wrong type argument'' error,
attributed to the subroutine named @var{subr}, operating on the value
@var{obj}, which is the @var{position}'th argument of @var{subr}.

In @code{SCM_ASSERT_TYPE}, @var{expected} is a C string describing the
type of argument that was expected.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn Macro int SCM_ARG1
@deftypefnx Macro int SCM_ARG2
@deftypefnx Macro int SCM_ARG3
@deftypefnx Macro int SCM_ARG4
@deftypefnx Macro int SCM_ARG5
@deftypefnx Macro int SCM_ARG6
@deftypefnx Macro int SCM_ARG7
One of the above values can be used for @var{position} to indicate the
number of the argument of @var{subr} which is being checked.
Alternatively, a positive integer number can be used, which allows to
check arguments after the seventh.  However, for parameter numbers up to
seven it is preferable to use @code{SCM_ARGN} instead of the
corresponding raw number, since it will make the code easier to
understand.
@end deftypefn

@deftypefn Macro int SCM_ARGn
Passing a value of zero or @code{SCM_ARGn} for @var{position} allows to
leave it unspecified which argument's type is incorrect.  Again,
@code{SCM_ARGn} should be preferred over a raw zero constant.
@end deftypefn

@node Continuation Barriers
@subsection Continuation Barriers

The non-local flow of control caused by continuations might sometimes
not be wanted. You can use @code{with-continuation-barrier} to erect
fences that continuations can not pass.

@deffn {Scheme Procedure} with-continuation-barrier proc
@deffnx {C Function} scm_with_continuation_barrier (proc)
Call @var{proc} and return its result.  Do not allow the invocation of
continuations that would leave or enter the dynamic extent of the call
to @code{with-continuation-barrier}.  Such an attempt causes an error
to be signaled.

Throws (such as errors) that are not caught from within @var{proc} are
caught by @code{with-continuation-barrier}.  In that case, a short
message is printed to the current error port and @code{#f} is returned.

Thus, @code{with-continuation-barrier} returns exactly once.
@end deffn

@deftypefn {C Function} {void *} scm_c_with_continuation_barrier (void *(*func) (void *), void *data)
Like @code{scm_with_continuation_barrier} but call @var{func} on
@var{data}.  When an error is caught, @code{NULL} is returned.
@end deftypefn


@c Local Variables:
@c TeX-master: "guile.texi"
@c End: