1
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git synced 2025-05-30 00:40:20 +02:00
guile/module/srfi/srfi-35.scm
Andy Wingo 90d52a9e1d Add `record-type-has-parent?'.
* module/ice-9/boot-9.scm (record-type-has-parent?): New function.
* module/srfi/srfi-35.scm (condition-type?): Use it.
2019-11-03 21:36:39 +01:00

251 lines
8.4 KiB
Scheme
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

;;; srfi-35.scm --- Conditions -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
;; Copyright (C) 2007-2011, 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
;;
;; This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
;; modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
;; License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
;; version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
;;
;; This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
;; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
;; Lesser General Public License for more details.
;;
;; You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
;; License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
;; Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
;;; Author: Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
;;; Commentary:
;; This is an implementation of SRFI-35, "Conditions". Conditions are a
;; means to convey information about exceptional conditions between parts of
;; a program.
;;; Code:
(define-module (srfi srfi-35)
#:use-module (ice-9 match)
#:export (make-condition-type condition-type?
make-condition condition? condition-has-type? condition-ref
make-compound-condition extract-condition
define-condition-type condition
&condition
&message message-condition? condition-message
&serious serious-condition?
&error error?))
(cond-expand-provide (current-module) '(srfi-35))
;;;
;;; Condition types.
;;;
;; Like default-record-printer, but prefixed with "condition ":
;; #<condition TYPE FIELD: VALUE ...>.
(define (print-condition c p)
(display "#<condition " p)
(display (record-type-name (record-type-descriptor c)) p)
(let loop ((fields (record-type-fields (record-type-descriptor c)))
(off 0))
(match fields
(() (display ">" p))
((field . fields)
(display " " p)
(display field p)
(display ": " p)
(display (struct-ref c off) p)
(loop fields (+ 1 off))))))
;; FIXME: Perhaps use a `define-record-type' which allows for parent types.
(define &condition
(make-record-type '&condition '() print-condition #:extensible? #t))
(define (make-condition-type id parent field-names)
"Return a new condition type named @var{id}, inheriting from
@var{parent}, and with the fields whose names are listed in
@var{field-names}. @var{field-names} must be a list of symbols and must
not contain names already used by @var{parent} or one of its
supertypes."
(unless (condition-type? parent)
(error "parent is not a condition type" parent))
(make-record-type id field-names print-condition #:parent parent
#:extensible? #t))
(define (condition-type? obj)
"Return true if OBJ is a condition type."
(and (record-type? obj)
(record-type-has-parent? obj &condition)))
(define simple-condition?
(record-predicate &condition))
;; Compound conditions are represented as a disjoint type, as users
;; never have access to compound condition types.
(define &compound-condition
(make-record-type 'compound-condition '(conditions)))
(define compound-condition?
(record-predicate &compound-condition))
(define %make-compound-condition
(record-constructor &compound-condition))
(define compound-condition-conditions
(record-accessor &compound-condition 'conditions))
;;;
;;; Conditions.
;;;
(define (condition? obj)
"Return true if @var{obj} is a condition."
(or (simple-condition? obj)
(compound-condition? obj)))
(define (condition-has-type? c type)
"Return true if condition C has type TYPE."
(unless (condition-type? type)
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "condition-has-type?" "Not a condition type: ~S"
(list type) #f))
(match c
(($ &compound-condition conditions)
(or-map (lambda (c) (condition-has-type? c type)) conditions))
((? simple-condition?)
((record-predicate type) c))
(_
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "condition-has-type?" "Not a condition: ~S"
(list c) #f))))
;; Precondition: C is a simple condition.
(define (simple-condition-ref c field-name not-found)
(match (list-index (record-type-fields (struct-vtable c)) field-name)
(#f (not-found))
(pos (struct-ref c pos))))
(define (condition-ref c field-name)
"Return the value of the field named FIELD-NAME from condition C."
(match c
(($ &compound-condition conditions)
(let lp ((conditions conditions))
(match conditions
(() (error "invalid field name" field-name))
((c . conditions)
(simple-condition-ref c field-name (lambda () (lp conditions)))))))
((? simple-condition?)
(simple-condition-ref c field-name
(lambda ()
(error "invalid field name" field-name))))
(_
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "condition-ref" "Not a condition: ~S"
(list c) #f))))
(define (make-condition-from-values type values)
(apply make-struct/simple type values))
(define (make-condition type . field+value)
"Return a new condition of type TYPE with fields initialized as specified
by FIELD+VALUE, a sequence of field names (symbols) and values."
(unless (condition-type? type)
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "make-condition" "Not a condition type: ~S"
(list type) #f))
(let ((c (make-struct/no-tail type)))
(let lp ((inits field+value) (fields (record-type-fields type)))
(match inits
(()
(match fields
(() c)
((field . fields)
(error "field not specified" field))))
(((and (? symbol?) field) value . inits)
(unless (memq field fields)
(error "unknown field, or duplicate initializer" field))
((record-modifier type field) c value)
(lp inits (delq field fields)))
(inits
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "make-condition"
"Bad initializer list tail: ~S"
(list inits) #f))))))
(define (make-compound-condition . conditions)
"Return a new compound condition composed of CONDITIONS."
(%make-compound-condition
(let lp ((conditions conditions))
(if (null? conditions)
'()
(let ((c (car conditions))
(conditions (cdr conditions)))
(cond
((compound-condition? c)
(append (compound-condition-conditions c) (lp conditions)))
(else
(unless (condition? c)
(throw 'wrong-type-arg "make-compound-condition"
"Not a condition: ~S" c))
(cons c (lp conditions)))))))))
(define (extract-condition c type)
"Return a condition of condition type TYPE with the field values specified
by C."
(unless (condition-type? type)
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "extract-condition" "Not a condition type: ~S"
(list type) #f))
(match c
(($ &compound-condition conditions)
(or-map (lambda (c) (extract-condition c type))
conditions))
((? simple-condition?)
(and ((record-predicate type) c)
c))
(_
(scm-error 'wrong-type-arg "extract-condition" "Not a condition: ~S"
(list c) #f))))
;;;
;;; Syntax.
;;;
(define-syntax-rule (define-condition-type name parent pred (field-name field-accessor) ...)
(begin
(define name
(make-condition-type 'name parent '(field-name ...)))
(define (pred c)
(condition-has-type? c name))
(define (field-accessor c)
(condition-ref c 'field-name))
...))
(define-syntax condition-instantiation
;; Build the `(make-condition type ...)' call.
(syntax-rules ()
((_ type (out ...))
(make-condition type out ...))
((_ type (out ...) (field-name field-value) rest ...)
(condition-instantiation type (out ... 'field-name field-value) rest ...))))
(define-syntax condition
(syntax-rules ()
((_ (type field ...))
(condition-instantiation type () field ...))
((_ (type field ...) ...)
(make-compound-condition (condition-instantiation type () field ...)
...))))
;;;
;;; Standard condition types.
;;;
(define-condition-type &message &condition
message-condition?
(message condition-message))
(define-condition-type &serious &condition
serious-condition?)
(define-condition-type &error &serious
error?)
;;; srfi-35.scm ends here