1
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git synced 2025-05-19 03:00:25 +02:00
guile/oop/goops/compile.scm
Andy Wingo 7d38f3d819 compile goops
The pending task is to make the accessors compiled too, and also to
compile compile.scm and dispatch.scm, and to integrate dispatch into the
VM.

* oop/Makefile.am (SOURCES): VM-ify the makefile, so we compile goops.scm
  by default.

* oop/goops.scm (load-toplevel): Load goops builtins when compiling too.
  (method): Fix a literal #<unspecified> in the generated procedure (for
  an empty body).
  (internal-add-method!): Cleverness when bootstrapping add-method!.
  Neat!
  (initialize for <generic>): Use the `method' macro so we get
  compilation support.

* oop/goops/dispatch.scm (cache-methods): Don't assume entries are pairs.
2008-10-31 00:07:04 +01:00

209 lines
7.5 KiB
Scheme
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

;;;; Copyright (C) 1999, 2001, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
;;;;
;;;; This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
;;;; modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
;;;; License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
;;;; version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
;;;;
;;;; This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
;;;; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
;;;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
;;;; Lesser General Public License for more details.
;;;;
;;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
;;;; License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
;;;; Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
;;;;
(define-module (oop goops compile)
:use-module (oop goops)
:use-module (oop goops util)
:export (compute-cmethod compute-entry-with-cmethod
compile-method cmethod-code cmethod-environment)
:no-backtrace
)
;;;
;;; Method entries
;;;
(define code-table-lookup
(letrec ((check-entry (lambda (entry types)
(if (null? types)
(and (not (struct? (car entry)))
entry)
(and (eq? (car entry) (car types))
(check-entry (cdr entry) (cdr types)))))))
(lambda (code-table types)
(cond ((null? code-table) #f)
((check-entry (car code-table) types)
=> (lambda (cmethod)
(cons (car code-table) cmethod)))
(else (code-table-lookup (cdr code-table) types))))))
(define (compute-entry-with-cmethod methods types)
(or (code-table-lookup (slot-ref (car methods) 'code-table) types)
(let* ((method (car methods))
(cmethod (compile-method methods types))
(entry (append types cmethod)))
(slot-set! method 'code-table
(cons entry (slot-ref method 'code-table)))
(cons entry cmethod))))
(define (compute-cmethod methods types)
(cdr (compute-entry-with-cmethod methods types)))
;;;
;;; Next methods
;;;
;;; Temporary solution---return #f if x doesn't refer to `next-method'.
(define (next-method? x)
(and (pair? x)
(or (eq? (car x) 'next-method)
(next-method? (car x))
(next-method? (cdr x)))))
(define (make-final-make-next-method method)
(lambda default-args
(lambda args
(@apply method (if (null? args) default-args args)))))
(define (make-final-make-no-next-method gf)
(lambda default-args
(lambda args
(no-next-method gf (if (null? args) default-args args)))))
;;;
;;; Method compilation
;;;
;;; So, for the reader: there basic idea is that, given that the
;;; semantics of `next-method' depend on the concrete types being
;;; dispatched, why not compile a specific procedure to handle each type
;;; combination that we see at runtime. There are two compilation
;;; strategies implemented: one for the memoizer, and one for the VM
;;; compiler.
;;;
;;; In theory we can do much better than a bytecode compilation, because
;;; we know the *exact* types of the arguments. It's ideal for native
;;; compilation. A task for the future.
;;;
;;; I think this whole generic application mess would benefit from a
;;; strict MOP.
(define (compile-method methods types)
(if (slot-ref (car methods) 'compile-env)
(compile-method/vm methods types)
(compile-method/memoizer methods types)))
(define (make-next-method gf methods types)
(if (null? methods)
(lambda args (no-next-method gf args))
(let ((cmethod (compute-cmethod methods types)))
(if (pair? cmethod)
;; if it's a pair, the next-method is interpreted
(local-eval (cons 'lambda (cmethod-code cmethod))
(cmethod-environment cmethod))
;; otherwise a normal procedure
cmethod))))
(define (compile-method/vm methods types)
(let* ((program-external (@ (system vm program) program-external))
(formals (slot-ref (car methods) 'formals))
(body (slot-ref (car methods) 'body)))
(cond
((not (next-method? body))
;; just one method to call -- in the future we could compile this
;; based on the types that we see, but for now just return the
;; method procedure (which is vm-compiled already)
(method-procedure (car methods)))
;; (and-map (lambda (m) (null? (slot-ref m 'compile-env))) methods)
;; many methods, but with no lexical bindings: can inline, in theory.
;;
;; modules complicate this though, the different method bodies only
;; make sense in the contexts of their modules. so while we could
;; expand this to a big letrec, there wouldn't be real inlining.
(else
(let* ((next-method-sym (gensym " next-method"))
(method (car methods))
(cmethod (compile
`(let ((,next-method-sym #f))
(lambda ,formals
(let ((next-method
(lambda args
(if (null? args)
,(if (list? formals)
`(,next-method-sym ,@formals)
`(apply
,next-method-sym
,@(improper->proper formals)))
(apply ,next-method-sym args)))))
,@body)))
(slot-ref method 'compile-env))))
(list-set! (program-external cmethod) 0
(make-next-method (method-generic-function method)
(cdr methods)
types))
cmethod)))))
;;;
;;; Compiling methods for the memoizer
;;;
(define source-formals cadr)
(define source-body cddr)
(define cmethod-code cdr)
(define cmethod-environment car)
(define %tag-body
(nested-ref the-root-module '(app modules oop goops %tag-body)))
;;; An exegetical note: the strategy here seems to be to (a) only put in
;;; next-method if it's referenced in the code; (b) memoize the lookup
;;; lazily, when `next-method' is first called.
(define (make-make-next-method/memoizer vcell gf methods types)
(lambda default-args
(lambda args
(if (null? methods)
(begin
(set-cdr! vcell (make-final-make-no-next-method gf))
(no-next-method gf (if (null? args) default-args args)))
(let* ((cmethod (compute-cmethod methods types))
(method (local-eval (cons 'lambda (cmethod-code cmethod))
(cmethod-environment cmethod))))
(set-cdr! vcell (make-final-make-next-method method))
(@apply method (if (null? args) default-args args)))))))
(define (compile-method/memoizer methods types)
(let* ((proc (method-procedure (car methods)))
;; XXX - procedure-source can not be guaranteed to be
;; reliable or efficient
(src (procedure-source proc))
(formals (source-formals src))
(body (source-body src)))
(if (next-method? body)
(let ((vcell (cons 'goops:make-next-method #f)))
(set-cdr! vcell
(make-make-next-method/memoizer
vcell
(method-generic-function (car methods))
(cdr methods) types))
;;*fixme*
`(,(cons vcell (procedure-environment proc))
,formals
;;*fixme* Only do this on source where next-method can't be inlined
(let ((next-method ,(if (list? formals)
`(goops:make-next-method ,@formals)
`(apply goops:make-next-method
,@(improper->proper formals)))))
,@body)))
(cons (procedure-environment proc)
(cons formals
(%tag-body body)))
)))