Andy Wingo 3e5d4131d2 Don't compile equal? to br-if-equal ... * module/language/cps/compile-bytecode.scm (compile-function): * module/language/cps/primitives.scm (*branching-primcall-arities*): * module/language/cps/type-fold.scm (equal?): * module/language/cps/types.scm (equal?): * module/language/tree-il/compile-cps.scm (convert): `equal?' is no longer a branching primcall, because it isn't inline. The implementation could lead to bad backtraces also, as it didn't save the IP, and actually could lead to segfaults as it didn't reload the SP after the return. There is an eqv? fast-path, though. * module/system/vm/assembler.scm (br-if-equal): Remove interface. * module/system/vm/disassembler.scm (code-annotation): (compute-labels): No need to handle br-if-equal.		2015-11-12 21:22:19 +01:00
..
base	(system base types) knows about variables	2015-02-17 10:58:29 +01:00
repl	Reflection support for unboxed f64 slots	2015-10-28 17:43:55 +00:00
vm	Don't compile equal? to br-if-equal	2015-11-12 21:22:19 +01:00
foreign-object.scm	Add #:static-slot-allocation?	2015-02-06 13:25:17 +01:00
foreign.scm	Merge commit 'f6ddf827f8'	2014-02-07 14:51:42 +01:00
xref.scm	rtl-program? -> program?	2013-11-19 19:11:40 +01:00