1
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git synced 2025-06-05 19:50:23 +02:00
guile/test-suite
Andy Wingo 950a762dc2 Multiple-value returns now start from slot 0, not slot 1
This should reduce frame sizes.

* libguile/vm-engine.c (halt): Adapt to multiple-values change.  Also
  adapt to not having the boot closure on the stack.
  (receive, receive-values, subr-call, foreign-call): Adapt to expect
  values one slot down.
  (prompt): Capture one less word for the values return.
* libguile/vm.c (vm_dispatch_pop_continuation_hook):
  (vm_dispatch_abort_hook): Adapt for where to expect values.
  (vm_builtin_values_code): Add a call to shuffle-down before
  returning.  This is more overhead than what existed before, but the
  hope is that the savings elsewhere pay off.
  (vm_builtin_values_code): Adapt to different values location.
  (reinstate_continuation_x, compose_continuation): Adapt to place
  resume args at right position.
  (capture_delimited_continuation): Remove unused sp and ip arguments.
  (abort_to_prompt): Adapt to capture_delimited_continuation change.
  (scm_call_n): Adapt to not reserve space for the boot closure.
* module/language/cps/compile-bytecode.scm (compile-function): When
  returning values, adapt reset-frame call for return calling convention
  change.  Adapt truncating or rest returns to expect values in the
  right place.
* module/language/cps/slot-allocation.scm (compute-shuffles):
  (allocate-lazy-vars, allocate-slots): Allocate values from the "proc
  slot", not proc-slot + 1.
* module/system/vm/assembler.scm (emit-init-constants): Reset the frame
  before returning so that the return value is in the right place.
* test-suite/tests/rtl.test: Update for return convention change.
* libguile/foreign.c (get_foreign_stub_code): Update for return calling
  convention change.
2018-07-20 11:42:30 +02:00
..
lalr remove duplicate when/unless definitions 2012-01-20 21:16:50 +01:00
standalone Replace uses of scm_t_int8, scm_t_uintmax, etc with stdint types 2018-06-21 20:18:54 +02:00
test-suite Remove mention of vm-error from test suite 2018-06-27 09:52:10 +02:00
tests Multiple-value returns now start from slot 0, not slot 1 2018-07-20 11:42:30 +02:00
vm Rename "RTL" to "bytecode" 2013-12-02 21:31:47 +01:00
ChangeLog-2008
guile-test Minor expansion of guile-test comments 2017-03-01 10:40:52 +01:00
Makefile.am Add sandboxed evaluation facility 2017-04-18 21:27:45 +02:00
README

This directory contains some tests for Guile, and some generic test
support code.

To run these tests, you will need a version of Guile more recent than
15 Feb 1999 --- the tests use the (ice-9 and-let*) and (ice-9
getopt-long) modules, which were added to Guile around then.

For information about how to run the test suite, read the usage
instructions in the comments at the top of the guile-test script.

You can reference the file `lib.scm' from your own code as the module
(test-suite lib); it also has comments at the top and before each
function explaining what's going on.

Please write more Guile tests, and send them to bug-guile@gnu.org.
We'll merge them into the distribution.  All test suites must be
licensed for our use under the GPL, but I don't think I'm going to
collect assignment papers for them.



Some test suite philosophy:

GDB has an extensive test suite --- around 6300 tests.  Every time the
test suite catches a bug, it's great.

GDB is so complicated that folks are often unable to get a solid
understanding of the code before making a change --- we just don't
have time.  You'll see people say things like, "Here's a fix for X; it
doesn't cause any regressions."  The subtext is, I made a change that
looks reasonable, and the test suite didn't complain, so it must be
okay.

I think this is terrible, because it suggests that the writer is using
the test suite as a substitute for having a rock-solid explanation of
why their changes are correct.  The problem is that any test suite is
woefully incomplete.  Diligent reasoning about code can catch corner
conditions or limitations that no test suite will ever find.



Jim's rule for test suites:

Every test suite failure should be a complete, mysterious surprise,
never a possibility you were prepared for.  Any other attitude
indicates that you're using the test suite as a crutch, which you need
only because your understanding is weak.