1
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guile.git synced 2025-04-30 03:40:34 +02:00
guile/doc/ref/api-languages.texi
Andy Wingo e6709db63f flesh out docs on multiple languages a bit more
* doc/ref/api-languages.texi: Move here from api-translation. Still
  stubbed in parts, but it's getting better.
* doc/ref/Makefile.am: Adapt to api-languages.texi name change.
* doc/ref/guile.texi: Likewise.
2010-04-16 10:36:04 +02:00

125 lines
4.3 KiB
Text

@c -*-texinfo-*-
@c This is part of the GNU Guile Reference Manual.
@c Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2010
@c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@c See the file guile.texi for copying conditions.
@page
@node Other Languages
@section Support for Other Languages
In addition to Scheme, a user may write a Guile program in an increasing
number of other languages. Currently supported languages include Emacs
Lisp and ECMAScript.
Guile is still fundamentally a Scheme, but it tries to support a wide
variety of language building-blocks, so that a user can implement other
languages on top of Guile. This section describes the languages that
have been implemented.
(For details on how to implement a language, @xref{Compiling to the
Virtual Machine}.)
@menu
* Using Other Languages:: How to use other languages.
* Emacs Lisp:: The dialect of Lisp used in Emacs.
* ECMAScript:: As seen on television.
@end menu
@node Using Other Languages
@subsection Using Other Languages
There are currently only two ways to access other languages from within
Guile: at the REPL, and via @code{compile} or @code{compile-file}.
The REPL is Guile's command prompt (@pxref{Using Guile Interactively}).
The REPL has a concept of the ``current language'', which defaults to
Scheme. The user may change that language, via the meta-command
@code{,language}.
For example, the following meta-command enables Emacs Lisp input:
@example
scheme@@(guile-user)> ,language elisp
Happy hacking with Emacs Lisp! To switch back, type `,L scheme'.
elisp@@(guile-user)> (eq 1 2)
$1 = #nil
@end example
Each language has its short name: for example, @code{elisp}, for Elisp.
The same short name may be used to compile source code programmatically,
via @code{compile}:
@example
elisp@@(guile-user)> ,L scheme
Happy hacking with Guile Scheme! To switch back, type `,L elisp'.
scheme@@(guile-user)> (compile '(eq 1 2) #:from 'elisp)
$2 = #nil
@end example
Granted, as the input to @code{compile} is a datum, this works best for
Lispy languages, which have a straightforward datum representation.
Other languages that need more parsing are better dealt with as strings.
The easiest way to deal with syntax-heavy language is with files, via
@code{compile-file} and friends. However it is possible to invoke a
language's reader on a port, and then compile the resulting expression
(which is a datum at that point). For more information,
@xref{Compilation}.
For more details on introspecting aspects of different languages,
@xref{Compiler Tower}.
@node Emacs Lisp
@subsection Emacs Lisp
Emacs Lisp (Elisp) is a dynamically-scoped Lisp dialect used in the
Emacs editor. @xref{top,,Overview,elisp,Emacs Lisp}, for more
information on Emacs Lisp.
We hope that eventually Guile's implementation of Elisp will be good
enough to replace Emacs' own implementation of Elisp. For that reason,
we have thought long and hard about how to support the various features
of Elisp in a performant and compatible manner.
Readers familiar with Emacs Lisp might be curious about how exactly
these various Elisp features are supported in Guile. The rest of this
section focuses on addressing these concerns of the Elisp elect.
@menu
* Nil:: A third boolean.
* Dynamic Binding:: Threadsafe bindings with fluids.
* Other Elisp Features:: Miscellany.
@end menu
@node Nil
@subsubsection Nil
@node Dynamic Binding
@subsubsection Dynamic Binding
@node Other Elisp Features
@subsubsection Other Elisp Features
@node ECMAScript
@subsection ECMAScript
ECMAScript was not the first non-Schemey language implemented by Guile,
but it was the first implemented for Guile's bytecode compiler. The goal
was to support ECMAScript version 3.1, a relatively small language, but
the implementor was completely irresponsible and got distracted by other
things before finishing the standard library, and even some bits of the
syntax. So, ECMAScript does deserve a mention in the manual, but it
doesn't deserve an endorsement until its implementation is completed,
perhaps by some more responsible hacker.
In the meantime, the charitable user might investigate such invocations
as @code{,L ecmascript} and @code{cat test-suite/tests/ecmascript.test}.
@c Local Variables:
@c TeX-master: "guile.texi"
@c End: