Placate a number of `syntax-check' verifications.

- "filesystem" -> "file system"
  - remove doubled words
  - use EXIT_* macros instead of literal numbers
  - update `syntax-check' exclusion files

.x-sc_bindtextdomain

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+*

.x-sc_error_message_uppercase

@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@
 ^emacs/
 ^NEWS
 ^doc/
+^test-suite/tests/ports.test

.x-sc_obsolete_symbols

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 doc/*
 lib/flock.c
+lib/fcntl.in.h
 libguile/filesys.c
 libguile/ChangeLog-2008

.x-sc_prohibit_doubled_word

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+^AUTHORS
+^gc-benchmarks/larceny/
+^module/ice-9/format.scm
+^module/ice-9/match.upstream.scm
+^module/sxml/upstream
+compile.scm
+ChangeLog

.x-sc_prohibit_have_config_h

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+libguile/*
+srfi/*
+test-suite/*
+guile-readline/*
+lib/*

.x-sc_prohibit_magic_number_exit

@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ configure.ac
 NEWS
 doc/ref/api-init.texi
 libguile/ChangeLog*
+m4/*

.x-sc_prohibit_path_max_allocation

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+libguile/win32-socket.c
+lib/stat.c

.x-sc_prohibit_strcmp

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+m4/*
+lib/*
+test-suite/*

HACKING

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 -*-text-*-
 Guile Hacking Guide
-Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2008 Free software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2008, 2012 Free software Foundation, Inc.
 
    Permission is granted to anyone to make or distribute verbatim copies
    of this document as received, in any medium, provided that the
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ When deprecating a definition, always follow this procedure:
    manage without the deprecated definition.
 
 4. Add an entry that the definition has been deprecated in NEWS and
-   explain what do do instead.
+   explain what to do instead.
 
 5. In file TODO, there is a list of releases with reminders about what
    to do at each release.  Add a reminder about the removal of the

NEWS

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Guile NEWS --- history of user-visible changes.
-Copyright (C) 1996-2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright (C) 1996-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 See the end for copying conditions.
 
 Please send Guile bug reports to bug-guile@gnu.org.
@@ -1386,7 +1386,7 @@ Arguments", and "Case-lambda" in the manual.
 
 Instead of accessing a procedure's arity as a property, use the new
 `procedure-minimum-arity' function, which gives the most permissive
-arity that the the function has, in the same format as the old arity
+arity that the function has, in the same format as the old arity
 accessor.
 
 ** `lambda*' and `define*' are now available in the default environment
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ allocated to primitive procedures, each with its own calling convention.
 Now there is only one, the gsubr. This may affect user code if you were
 defining a procedure using scm_c_make_subr rather scm_c_make_gsubr. The
 solution is to switch to use scm_c_make_gsubr. This solution works well
-both with the old 1.8 and and with the current 1.9 branch.
+both with the old 1.8 and with the current 1.9 branch.
 
 Guile's old evaluator used to have special cases for applying "gsubrs",
 primitive procedures with specified numbers of required, optional, and
@@ -6193,7 +6193,7 @@ incrementally add to the innermost environment, without checking
 whether the restrictions specified in RnRS were met.  This lead to the
 correct behaviour when these restriction actually were met, but didn't
 catch all illegal uses.  Such an illegal use could lead to crashes of
-the Guile interpreter or or other unwanted results.  An example of
+the Guile interpreter or other unwanted results.  An example of
 incorrect internal defines that made Guile behave erratically:
 
   (let ()

doc/maint/guile.texi

@@ -7132,7 +7132,7 @@ with the strings in the list @var{ls}.
 @deffn {Scheme Procedure} string-concatenate-reverse/shared ls [final_string [end]]
 @deffnx {C Function} scm_string_concatenate_reverse_shared (ls, final_string, end)
 Like @code{string-concatenate-reverse}, but the result may
-share memory with the the strings in the @var{ls} arguments.
+share memory with the strings in the @var{ls} arguments.
 @end deffn
 
 string-map

doc/ref/api-compound.texi

@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ same type, and have corresponding elements which are either
 @c  FIXME: array-for-each doesn't say what happens if the sources have
 @c  different index ranges.  The code currently iterates over the
 @c  indices of the first and expects the others to cover those.  That
-@c  at least vaguely matches array-map!, but is is meant to be a
+@c  at least vaguely matches array-map!, but is it meant to be a
 @c  documented feature?
 
 @deffn {Scheme Procedure} array-map! dst proc src1 @dots{} srcN

doc/ref/api-procedures.texi

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 @c -*-texinfo-*-
 @c This is part of the GNU Guile Reference Manual.
-@c Copyright (C)  1996, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2011
+@c Copyright (C)  1996, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2009, 2010,
-@c   Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+@c   2011, 2012  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 @c See the file guile.texi for copying conditions.
 
 @node Procedures
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ demonstrably improves performance in a crucial way.
 In general, only small procedures should be considered for inlining, as
 making large procedures inlinable will probably result in an increase in
 code size.  Additionally, the elimination of the call overhead rarely
-matters for for large procedures.
+matters for large procedures.
 
 @deffn {Scheme Syntax} define-inlinable (name parameter ...) body ...
 Define @var{name} as a procedure with parameters @var{parameter}s and

doc/sources/env.texi

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 [[add refs for all conditions signalled]]
 
 @ifinfo
-Copyright 1999, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright 1999, 2006, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 @end ifinfo
 
 @titlepage
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ can implement any module system you like, as long as its efforts produce
 an environment object the interpreter can consult.
 
 Finally, environments may prove a convenient way for Guile to access the
-features of other systems.  For example, one might export the The GIMP's
+features of other systems.  For example, one might export The GIMP's
 Procedural Database to Guile as a custom environment type; this
 environment could create Scheme procedure objects corresponding to GIMP
 procedures, as the user referenced them.

libguile/strings.h

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
    - SCM_STRING_CHARS uses scm_i_string_writable_chars and immediately
      calls scm_i_stop_writing, hoping for the best.  SCM_STRING_LENGTH
      is the same as scm_i_string_length.  SCM_STRING_CHARS will throw
-     an error for for strings that are not null-terminated.  There is
+     an error for strings that are not null-terminated.  There is
      no wide version of this interface.
 */
 

libguile/threads.c

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1995,1996,1997,1998,2000,2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
+ *   2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
+ *   Free Software Foundation, Inc.
  *
  * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
  * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License
@@ -25,6 +27,7 @@
 #include "libguile/bdw-gc.h"
 #include "libguile/_scm.h"
 
+#include <stdlib.h>
 #if HAVE_UNISTD_H
 #include <unistd.h>
 #endif
@@ -862,7 +865,7 @@ scm_init_guile ()
   else
     {
       fprintf (stderr, "Failed to get stack base for current thread.\n");
-      exit (1);
+      exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
     }
 }
 

module/ice-9/boot-9.scm

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 ;;; -*- mode: scheme; coding: utf-8; -*-
 
-;;;; Copyright (C) 1995,1996,1997,1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011
+;;;; Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003,
+;;;;   2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
 ;;;;   Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 ;;;;
 ;;;; This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -3013,7 +3014,7 @@ module '(ice-9 q) '(make-q q-length))}."
           ;; 0 by printing a newline, but we then advance it by printing
           ;; the prompt.  However the port-column of the output port
           ;; does not typically correspond with the actual column on the
-          ;; screen, because the input is is echoed back!  Since the
+          ;; screen, because the input is echoed back!  Since the
           ;; input is line-buffered and thus ends with a newline, the
           ;; output will really start on column zero.  So, here we zero
           ;; it out.  See bug 9664.

module/ice-9/psyntax.scm

@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@
     ;;
     ;; The only wrinkle is when we want a macro to expand to code in another
     ;; module, as is the case for the r6rs `library' form -- the body expressions
-    ;; should be scoped relative the the new module, the one defined by the macro.
+    ;; should be scoped relative the new module, the one defined by the macro.
     ;; For that, use `(@@ mod-name body)'.
     ;;
     ;; Part of the macro output will be from the site of the macro use and part

module/ice-9/test.scm

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 ;;;; "test.scm" Test correctness of scheme implementations.
 ;;; Author: Aubrey Jaffer
 ;;; Modified: Mikael Djurfeldt (Removed tests which Guile deliberately
-;;; won't pass.  Made the the tests (test-cont), (test-sc4), and
+;;; won't pass.  Made the tests (test-cont), (test-sc4), and
 ;;; (test-delay) start to run automatically.
 
 ;;; This includes examples from

module/language/elisp/runtime/macros.scm

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
                         (progn ,@(cdr cur))
                         ,rest))))))))
 
-;;; The and and or forms can also be easily defined with macros.
+;;; The `and' and `or' forms can also be easily defined with macros.
 
 (built-in-macro and
   (case-lambda

module/language/tree-il/fix-letrec.scm

@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
                           c)
                      (list body)))
                    (else
-                    ;; Otherwise for plain letrec, evaluate the the "complex"
+                    ;; Otherwise for plain letrec, evaluate the "complex"
                     ;; bindings, in a `let' to indicate that order doesn't
                     ;; matter, and bind to their variables.
                     (list

module/srfi/srfi-1.scm

@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ has just one element then that's the return value."
 (define map! map)
 
 (define (filter-map proc list1 . rest)
-  "Apply PROC to to the elements of LIST1... and return a list of the
+  "Apply PROC to the elements of LIST1... and return a list of the
 results as per SRFI-1 `map', except that any #f results are omitted from
 the list returned."
   (check-arg procedure? proc filter-map)

module/system/base/compile.scm

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
 ;;; This function is among the trickiest I've ever written. I tried many
 ;;; variants. In the end, simple is best, of course.
 ;;;
-;;; After turning this around a number of times, it seems that the the
+;;; After turning this around a number of times, it seems that the
 ;;; desired behavior is that .go files should exist in a path, for
 ;;; searching. That is orthogonal to this function. For writing .go
 ;;; files, either you know where they should go, in which case you tell

test-suite/lib.scm

@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 ;;;;
 ;;;; * (pass-if-exception name exception body) will pass if the execution of
 ;;;;   body causes the given exception to be thrown.  If no exception is
-;;;;   thrown, the test fails.  If some other exception is thrown, is is an
+;;;;   thrown, the test fails.  If some other exception is thrown, it is an
 ;;;;   error.
 ;;;; * (expect-fail-exception name exception body) will pass unexpectedly if
 ;;;;   the execution of body causes the given exception to be thrown.  If no

test-suite/tests/r4rs.test

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 ;;;; Author: Aubrey Jaffer
 ;;;; Modified: Mikael Djurfeldt
 ;;;;   Removed tests which Guile deliberately
-;;;;   won't pass.  Made the the tests (test-cont), (test-sc4), and
+;;;;   won't pass.  Made the tests (test-cont), (test-sc4), and
 ;;;;   (test-delay) start to run automatically.
 ;;;; Modified: Jim Blandy
 ;;;;   adapted to new Guile test suite framework

test-suite/tests/srfi-67.test

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 ; Test engine
 ; ===========
 ;
-; We use an extended version of the the checker of SRFI-42 (with
+; We use an extended version of the checker of SRFI-42 (with
 ; Felix' reduction on codesize) for running a batch of tests for
 ; the various procedures of 'compare.scm'. Moreover, we use the
 ; comprehensions of SRFI-42 to generate examples systematically.

test-suite/tests/statprof.test

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 
         (let ((drift-fraction (/ max-diff average)))
           (or (< drift-fraction max-allowed-drift)
-              ;; don't stop the the test suite for what statistically is
+              ;; don't stop the test suite for what statistically is
               ;; bound to happen.
               (throw 'unresolved (pk average drift-fraction))))))))